Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28124478›Full record

Trial reportClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2017

Defining the optimal dose of rifapentine for pulmonary tuberculosis: Exposure-response relations from two phase II clinical trials.

R M Savic, M Weiner, W R MacKenzie, M Engle, W C Whitworth, J L Johnson, P Nsubuga, P Nahid, N V Nguyen, C A Peloquin and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. A systematic review and meta-analysis of first-line tuberculosis drug concentrations and treatment outcomes.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Treatment of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. An Official ATS/CDC/ERS/IDSA Clinical Practice Guideline.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2019
    Guideline
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Optimising pyrazinamide for the treatment of tuberculosis.The European respiratory journal · 2021
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Review
  15. Real-world challenges of 4-month rifapentine-moxifloxacin TB regimen: High hyperbilirubinemia in Thailand.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. REVOLUTIONIZING TUBERCULOSIS REGIMEN DEVELOPMENT.Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association · 2025
    Review
  18. Therapeutic drug monitoring in tuberculosis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  19. An Overview of Various Rifampicin Analogs againstMedicinal chemistry (Shariqah (United Arab Emirates)) · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

R M SavicUniversity of California San Francisco School of Pharmacy, San Francisco, California, USA.
M WeinerVeterans Administration Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
W R MacKenzieCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
M EngleUniversity of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
W C WhitworthCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
J L JohnsonCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine and University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
P NsubugaUganda-Case Western Reserve University Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
P NahidUniversity of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA.
N V NguyenNational Tuberculosis Program, Hanoi, Vietnam.
C A PeloquinCollege of Pharmacy and Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
K E DooleyJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
S E DormanJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Tuberculosis Trials Consortium of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USMUJHU Research Collaboration · UGThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs · USUniversity Hospitals Case Medical Center · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Institute for Integration of Medicine & Science: A Partnership to Improve HealthUL1TR001120 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CLARK, ROBERT A, HARGREAVES, KENNETH M · 2013 to 2017
$16.5M
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rifapentine is a highly active antituberculosis antibiotic with treatment-shortening potential; however, exposure-response relations and the dose needed for maximal bactericidal activity have not been established. We used pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data from 657 adults with pulmonary tuberculosis participating in treatment trials to compare rifapentine (n = 405) with rifampin (n = 252) as part of intensive-phase therapy. Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses were performed with nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Time to stable culture conversion of sputum to negative was determined in cultures obtained over 4 months of therapy. Rifapentine exposures were lower in participants who were coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus, black, male, or fasting when taking drug. Rifapentine exposure, large lung cavity size, and geographic region were independently associated with time to culture conversion in liquid media. Maximal treatment efficacy is likely achieved with rifapentine at 1,200 mg daily. Patients with large lung cavities appear less responsive to treatment, even at high rifapentine doses.

Indexed as

AdultAntibiotics, AntitubercularDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMaleRifampinTuberculosis, PulmonaryAntibiotics, AntitubercularRifampinrifapentine

Identifiers

PMID28124478
PMCPMC5545752
OpenAlexW2582762749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.