Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28124295›Full record

Trial reportFamilial cancer2017

Psychosocial morbidity in TP53 mutation carriers: is whole-body cancer screening beneficial?

Kate A McBride, Mandy L Ballinger, Timothy E Schlub, Mary-Anne Young, Martin H N Tattersall, Judy Kirk, Ros Eeles, Emma Killick, Leslie G Walker, Sue Shanley and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Familial cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Provider and patient perceptions on the usage of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in oncology: a scoping review.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Evaluation of Germline Pathogenic Variant ofAdvanced biomedical research · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Emerging insights into ethnic-specific TP53 germline variants.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2023
    Review
  15. Whole-body MRI for cancer surveillance in ataxia-telangiectasia: A qualitative study of the perspectives of people affected by A-T and their families.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Kate A McBrideSchool of Science and Health and Centre for Health Research, Western Sydney University, Building 3, Centre for Health Research, Campbelltown, NSW, 2560, Australia. k.mcbride@westernsydney.edu.au.
Mandy L BallingerThe Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia.
Timothy E SchlubSydney School of Public Health, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Mary-Anne YoungFamilial Cancer Clinic, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, E. Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia.
Martin H N TattersallDepartment of Cancer Medicine, The Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney Medical School, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Judy KirkThe Familial Cancer Service, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia.
Ros EelesOncogenetics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Emma KillickMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Leslie G WalkerUniversity of Hull, Kingston upon Hull, UK.
Sue ShanleyFamilial Cancer Clinic, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, E. Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia.
David M ThomasThe Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia.
Gillian MitchellFamilial Cancer Clinic, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, E. Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia.
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUCancer Australia · AUChris O’Brien Lifehouse · AUGarvan Institute of Medical Research · AUInstitute of Cancer Research · GBSydney Local Health District · AUThe Kinghorn Cancer Centre · AUUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Hull · GBWestern Sydney University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Germline TP53 mutation carriers are at high risk of developing a range of cancers. Effective cancer risk management is an important issue for these individuals. We assessed the psychosocial impact in TP53 mutation carriers of WB-MRI screening as part of the Surveillance in Multi-Organ Cancer (SMOC+) protocol, measuring their unmet needs, anxiety and depression levels as well as cancer worry using psychological questionnaires and in-depth interviews about their experiences of screening. We present preliminary psychosocial findings from 17 participants during their first 12 months on the trial. We found a significant reduction in participants' mean anxiety from baseline to two weeks post WB-MRI (1.2, 95% CI 0.17 to 2.23 p = 0.025), indicative of some benefit. Emerging qualitative themes show most participants are emotionally supported and contained by the screening program and are motivated by their immediate concern about staying alive, despite being informed about the current lack of evidence around efficacy of screening for people with TP53 mutations in terms of cancer morbidity or mortality. For those that do gain emotional reassurance from participating in the screening study, feelings of abandonment by the research team are a risk when the study ends. For others, screening was seen as a burden, consistent with the relentless nature of cancer risk associated with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, though these patients still declared they wished to participate due to their concern with staying alive. Families with TP53 mutations need ongoing support due to the impact on the whole family system. These findings suggest a comprehensive multi-organ screening program for people with TP53 mutations provides psychological benefit independent of an impact on cancer morbidity and mortality associated with the syndrome. The benefits of a multi-organ screening program will be greater still if the screening tests additionally reduce the cancer morbidity and mortality associated with the syndrome. These findings may also inform the care of individuals and families with other multi-organ cancer predisposition syndromes.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHeterozygoteHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedMutationTumor Suppressor Protein p53Young AdultTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53Hereditary cancerLi-Fraumeni syndromeMixed methodsPsychosocialScreeningTP53

Identifiers

PMID28124295
OpenAlexW2581633203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.