ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2018
Feasibility of automated titration of vasopressor infusions using a novel closed-loop controller.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Control of mean arterial pressure using a closed-loop system for norepinephrine infusion in severe brain injury patients: the COMAT randomized controlled trial.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2024Trial
- Tight control of mean arterial pressure using a closed loop system for norepinephrine infusion after high-risk abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2024Trial
- Computer-assisted Individualized Hemodynamic Management Reduces Intraoperative Hypotension in Intermediate- and High-risk Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Anesthesiology · 2021Trial
- Automated closed-loop versus manually controlled norepinephrine infusion in patients undergoing intermediate- to high-risk abdominal surgery: a randomised controlled trial.British journal of anaesthesia · 2021Trial
- Comparison of Controller Logics for Automating Vasopressor Administration Using a Hardware-in-Loop Test Platform.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development of a vasopressor control module for testing hemorrhagic shock resuscitation controllers.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Automated Vasopressor Administration Algorithms Using Lower-Limit Control for Intraoperative Hypotension: A Simulation Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Personalized pulse wave propagation modeling to improve vasopressor dosing management in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Safe automation of interfering medical treatments via control barrier functions and reachability analysis: a fluid resuscitation-sedation-vasopressor infusion case study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Perioperative Care: Opportunities and Challenges.Anesthesiology · 2024Article
- Review
- Systolic Arterial Pressure Control Using an Automated Closed-Loop System for Vasopressor Infusion during Intermediate-to-High-Risk Surgery: A Feasibility Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Hydroxyethyl starch for perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy in 2020: a narrative review.BMC anesthesiology · 2020Review
- Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing end of year summary 2019: hemodynamic monitoring and management.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2020Review
- Automated systems for perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy.Journal of anesthesia · 2020Review
- Closed-loop vasopressor control: in-silico study of robustness against pharmacodynamic variability.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2019Article
- Feasibility of closed-loop titration of norepinephrine infusion in patients undergoing moderate- and high-risk surgery.British journal of anaesthesia · 2019Article
- Journal of clinical monitoring and computing end of year summary 2018: hemodynamic monitoring and management.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2019Review
- Computer simulated modeling of healthy and diseased right ventricular and pulmonary circulation.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2018Article
- Closed-loop regulation of arterial pressure after acute brain death.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood pressure management is a central concern in critical care patients. For a variety of reasons, titration of vasopressor infusions may be an ideal use-case for computer assistance. Using our previous experience gained in the bench-to-bedside development of a computer-assisted fluid management system, we have developed a novel controller for this purpose. The aim of this preliminary study was to assess the feasibility of using this controller in simulated patients to maintain a target blood pressure in both stable and variable blood-pressure scenarios. We tested the controller in two sets of simulation scenarios: one with stable underlying blood pressure and a second with variable underlying blood pressure. In addition, in the variable phase of the study, we tested infusion-line delays of 8-60 s. The primary outcome for both testing conditions (stable and variable) was % case time in target range. We determined a priori that acceptable performance on the first phase of the protocol would require greater than 95% case-time in-target given the simple nature of the protocol, and for the second phase of the study 80% or greater given the erratic nature of the blood pressure changes taking place. 250 distinct cases for each simulation condition, both managed and unmanaged, were run over 4 days. In the stable hemodynamic conditions, the unmanaged group had an MAP of 57.5 ± 4.6 mmHg and spent only 5.6% of case time in-target. The managed group had an MAP of 70.3 ± 2.6 and spent a total of 99.5% of case time in-target (p < 0.00001 for both comparisons between groups). In the variable hemodynamic conditions, the unmanaged group had an MAP of 53.1 ± 5.0 mmHg and spent 0% of case time in-target. The managed group had an MAP of 70.5 ± 3.2 mmHg (p < 0.00001 compared to unmanaged group) and spent 88.6% of case time in-target (p < 0.00001 compared to unmanaged group), with 6.4% of case time over and 5.1% of case time under target. Increasing infusion lag increased coefficient of variation by about 10% per 15 s of lag (p = 0.001). This study demonstrated that this novel controller for vasopressor administration is able to main a target mean arterial pressure in a simulated physiologic model in the face of random disturbances and infusion-line lag.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.