Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28124203›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in gastroenterology2017

The Role of Allergy Testing in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: an Update of the Evidence.

Hamish Philpott, Francis Thien

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hamish PhilpottDepartment of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine Eastern Health, Monash University, 3 Arnold St Box Hill, Melbourne, 3128, Australia. Hamish.philpott@outlook.com.
Francis ThienDepartment of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine Eastern Health, Monash University, 3 Arnold St Box Hill, Melbourne, 3128, Australia.
Eastern Health · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementAllergy testing has been advocated for patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) as a means of defining food triggers and directing dietary therapy. Several recent and comprehensive studies have demonstrated the futility of skin prick (SPT), skin patch (APT) and serum food antigen specific IgE (SIgE) estimates in this context. Furthermore, if identification of food triggers is the endpoint (as opposed to the ability of an allergy test-directed diet merely to induce remission), previous positive studies have limitations. Evolving evidence that EoE may be a non-IgE-mediated disease has led to trials of new assays including serum IgG to food allergens, the cytokine thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) and basophil activation, all without success. Rather than using allergy test-directed diets, the clinician should use empirical elimination diets which are practical, and consider minimally invasive sampling of the oesophagus to facilitate dietary reintroduction. Research should be redoubled to consider not only assays to predict food triggers but also those that monitor disease activity. The anti-inflammatory effect of proton pump inhibitors and deficits in barrier integrity may influence the success of dietary therapy and the results of allergy tests and should be considered in future research design.

Indexed as

AllergyDiagnosisDietEosinophilOesophagus

Identifiers

PMID28124203
OpenAlexW2580175903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.