Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28124138›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2017

Monitoring of bacterial pathogens at workplaces in power plant using biochemical and molecular methods.

Anna Ławniczek-Wałczyk, Małgorzata Gołofit-Szymczak, Marcin Cyprowski, Agata Stobnicka, Rafał L Górny

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Across-Shift Changes in Viable Nasal Bacteria among Waste-Incineration Plant Workers-A Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna Ławniczek-WałczykBiohazard Laboratory, Department of Chemical, Aerosol and Biological Hazards, Central Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, Czerniakowska 16 Street, 00-701, Warsaw, Poland. anlaw@ciop.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8234-340X
Małgorzata Gołofit-SzymczakBiohazard Laboratory, Department of Chemical, Aerosol and Biological Hazards, Central Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, Czerniakowska 16 Street, 00-701, Warsaw, Poland.
Marcin CyprowskiBiohazard Laboratory, Department of Chemical, Aerosol and Biological Hazards, Central Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, Czerniakowska 16 Street, 00-701, Warsaw, Poland.
Agata StobnickaBiohazard Laboratory, Department of Chemical, Aerosol and Biological Hazards, Central Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, Czerniakowska 16 Street, 00-701, Warsaw, Poland.
Rafał L GórnyBiohazard Laboratory, Department of Chemical, Aerosol and Biological Hazards, Central Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, Czerniakowska 16 Street, 00-701, Warsaw, Poland.
Central Institute for Labour Protection · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to characterize the ways of spreading of the most common bacterial species isolated from workers as well as from the air and raw materials at the workplaces in power plant utilizing biomass sources. To monitor microbial transmission and identify the source of contamination in the working environment, a combination of molecular and biochemical methods was applied.

methodsThe study was carried out at workplaces in power plant utilizes biomass as a main fuel source. At each of the studied workplaces, bioaerosol particles were collected on sterile Teflon filters using personal conical inhalable samplers (CIS), and biomass samples (straw pellets and briquettes, corn briquettes, sunflower pellets and wood chips) were directly taken from their storage places. Simultaneously with that, the swab samples from the hands of ten workers and their used respiratory masks (of FFP2 class) were also collected after the work shift to evaluate individual workers' microbial contamination. In all collected samples, total bacterial concentrations were assessed and the most common microbial isolates were identified to the species level using both biochemical (API tests) and molecular polymerase chain reaction (PCR), followed by random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) typing methods.

resultsThe mean concentrations of culturable bacteria in the air and in biomass samples at the studied workplaces were high, i.e. 1.2 × 10

conclusionThis study demonstrated that biomass is the primary source of bacteria at power plant workplaces. These results also revealed that biomass-associated bacteria can be easily transferred to workers' hands and mask during their routine activities. To improve health protection at the workplaces, adequate training courses on hand hygiene and how to use and remove respiratory masks correctly for workers should be introduced as a key element of the prevention strategy. From the occupational point of view, the PCR-based methods seem to be an efficient tool for a fast and precise typing of bacterial strains isolated from different sources in the occupational environment. Such methods may help to implement appropriate prophylactic procedures and minimize transmission of infectious agents at workplaces.

Indexed as

Air MicrobiologyAir Pollution, IndoorBacteriaBiomassColony Count, MicrobialEnvironmental MonitoringHandHumansOccupational ExposurePolandPolymerase Chain ReactionPower PlantsRandom Amplified Polymorphic DNA TechniqueRespiratory Protective DevicesWorkplaceBacteriaMolecular typingOccupational exposureRAPD-PCRSource tracking

Identifiers

PMID28124138
PMCPMC5360828
OpenAlexW2580055999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.