ArticlePublic health action2016
The ripple effect: why promoting female leadership in global health matters.
Article in Public health action, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Female Global Scholars Program: A mixed-methods evaluation of a novel intervention to promote the retention and advancement of women in global health research.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Supporting early-career women researchers: lessons from a global mentorship programme.Global health action · 2023Article
- Experiences of Organizational Practices That Advance Women in Health Care Leadership.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Article
- Does global health governance walk the talk? Gender representation in World Health Assemblies, 1948-2021.BMJ global health · 2022Article
- Prioritizing gender equity and intersectionality in Canadian global health institutions and partnerships.PLOS global public health · 2022Review
- Gender inequality in the global mental health research workforce: a research authorship scoping review and qualitative study in Nepal.BMJ global health · 2021Article
- Dual-Gendered Leadership: Gender-Inclusive Scientific-Political Public Health Communication Supporting Government COVID-19 Responses in Atlantic Canada.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Impact of a rural drowning reduction programme in Bangladesh on gender equity, norms and behaviour: a mixed-method analysis.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Supporting early-career mentorship for women in Health Policy and Systems Research: a vital input to building the field.Health policy and planning · 2020Article
- Exploring Women Healthcare Leaders' Perceptions on Barriers to Leadership in Greek Context.Frontiers in public health · 2019Article
- Women, healthcare leadership and societal culture: a qualitative study.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Leadership positions in global health are greatly skewed toward men; the imbalance is more pronounced in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The under-representation of women in leadership is a threat to gender equality, and also impacts the improvement of women's health outcomes globally. In this perspectives piece, we assert that the promotion and retention of women in global health leadership has a ripple effect that can achieve improvement in global health outcomes. We present pragmatic, actionable solutions to promote and retain female global health leaders in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.