ArticleCureus2016
Serum Apo A-1 and Its Role as a Biomarker of Coronary Artery Disease.
Article in Cureus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Impact of Modern Industrialized Dietary Sodium Intake on the Plasma Proteome.American journal of hypertension · 2026Article
- Salivary small extracellular vesicles reveal protein signatures in young patients with coronary artery disease.Clinical proteomics · 2025Article
- Differential distribution of plasma apoA-I and apoB levels and clinical significance of apoB/apoA-I ratio in ischemic stroke subtypes.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Brain nuclear receptors and cardiovascular function.Cell & bioscience · 2023Review
- Osteoblast Demineralization Induced by Oxidized High-Density Lipoprotein via the Inflammatory Pathway Is Suppressed by Adiponectin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Label-Free Electrochemiluminescence Nano-aptasensor for the Ultrasensitive Detection of ApoA1 in Human Serum.ACS omega · 2022Article
- Predictive value of the apolipoprotein B/A1 ratio in intracerebral hemorrhage outcomes.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2022Article
- Metal additive manufacturing and possible clinical markers for the monitoring of exposure-related health effects.PloS one · 2021Observational
- Structural analysis of lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase bound to high density lipoprotein particles.Communications biology · 2020Article
- Comparison of apolipoprotein-A1 levels between paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients and healthy subjects.Journal of cardiovascular and thoracic research · 2020Article
- Estimation of apolipoprotein A in early onset ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Cardiovascular endocrinology & metabolism · 2019Article
- Genetic control of apoprotein A-I and atheroprotection: some insights from inbred strains of mice.Current opinion in lipidology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the role of apolipoprotein(Apo A-1) as a biomarker of coronary artery disease (CAD) and its comparison with the traditional marker high-density lipoprotein (HDL). METHODOLOGY: One hundred patients proven to have coronary artery disease by angiography were recruited and their serum biomarkers were compared with 100 normal individuals adjusted for age and sex.
resultThe mean +/-standard deviation (SD) value of plasma Apo A-1 levels in the normal individuals were observed to be 207.42 +/- 41.35 (mg/dL) against 90.69 +/- 20.77 (mg/dL) in the cardiac patients. On the other hand the serum HDL levels were 52.93 +/-33.58 (mg/dL) in the normal individuals and 37.86 +/- 23.19 (mg/dL) in the cardiac patients. Both of these differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001). For Apo A-1, a large proportion of patients (85%) were found to be in the abnormal range when compared to the control group in which only 7% had an abnormal value. For HDL, a majority (70%) of the cardiac patients had abnormal values while 40% of the normal individuals also had abnormal values. The sensitivity of Apo A-1 for detecting CAD was 85%, while for HDL, it was only 69%. Similarly, the specificity of Apo A-1 for detecting CAD was 93%, while for HDL, it was 60%. When plotted on a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, Apo A-1 had a much larger area under the curve when compared to HDL.
conclusionThis study suggests that Apo A-1 may, in fact, be more sensitive than HDL as a predictor of CAD. However, to completely elucidate its role as a biomarker, to set target serum levels and to increase its clinical use, further studies are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.