ArticleWorld journal of emergency medicine2017
Comparison of extracorporeal and conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A meta-analysis of 2 260 patients with cardiac arrest.
Article in World journal of emergency medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Neurological outcome after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2020Pooled it
- Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Cardiac Indications in Adults: A Health Technology Assessment.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2020Pooled it
- Clinical Efficacy of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Adults with Cardiac Arrest: Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis.BioMed research international · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Differences in outcomes of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation between day-time and night-time.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Potential role for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) during in-hospital cardiac arrest in Australia: A nested cohort study.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2023Article
- Analyzing willingness for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in refractory ventricular fibrillation.PloS one · 2023Article
- Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults and children: A review of literature, published guidelines and pediatric single-center program building experience.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Application of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adult patients with refractory cardiac arrest.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Article
- Analysis of Nosocomial Infection and Risk Factors in Patients with ECMO Treatment.Infection and drug resistance · 2021Article
- Long-term neurologically intact survival after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Resuscitation plus · 2020Review
- The 'Weekend Effect' in adult patients who receive extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation after in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Resuscitation plus · 2020Article
- Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score-matched cohort studies.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2020Article
- In-Depth Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Adult Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Review
- Patient and Institutional Characteristics Influence the Decision to Use Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Observational
- CPR and ECMO: The Next Frontier.Rambam Maimonides medical journal · 2020Review
- A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of extracorporeal-CPR versus conventional-CPR for adult patients in cardiac arrest.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2019Review
- Contemporary Management of Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest in the Cardiac Catheterisation Laboratory: Current Status and Future Directions.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2019Review
- Paediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.BJA education · 2018Review
- Pre-hospital extra-corporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis meta-analysis aimed to determine whether extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), compared with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR), improves outcomes in adult patients with cardiac arrest (CA). DATA RESOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and China Biological Medicine Database were searched for relevant articles. The baseline information and outcome data (survival, good neurological outcome at discharge, at 3-6 months, and at 1 year after CA) were collected and extracted by two authors. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Review Manager 5.3.
resultsIn six studies 2 260 patients were enrolled to study the survival rate to discharge and long-term neurological outcome published since 2000. A significant effect of ECPR was observed on survival rate to discharge compared to CCPR in CA patients (
conclusionECPR showed a beneficial effect on survival rate to discharge and long-term neurological outcome over CCPR in adult patients with CA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.