ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2017
Clinical effect of preoperative high-dose atorvastatin against no-reflow after PCI.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of high-intensity statin on coronary microvascular dysfunction.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of the Treatment Efficacy of Rosuvastatin versus Atorvastatin Loading Prior to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Enhanced-Dose Statins for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients after Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Disease markers · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the use of preoperative high-dose atorvastatin to prevent the no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A total of 138 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, admitted from March 2014 to January 2015, were enrolled and randomly divided into 3 groups of 46 individuals each. The groups included a control group in which patients were not treated with atorvastatin before PCI; a conventional-dose atorvastatin treatment group in which patients received a single dose of 20 mg at bedtime one day prior to PCI; and a high-dose atorvastatin treatment group in which patients were treated with 40 mg divided in two doses the day before PCI. The treatment effects were assessed by re-examining the echocardiography, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels after the PCI. The follow-up examinations included determinations of ultrasound imaging indicators and the contact with patients was maintained for a whole year. The CTFC (frame), pro-BNP, CK-MB peak and WMSI levels of the patients in the high-dose treatment group were significantly lower than those in the conventional dose or the control group. Trombolysis in myocardial infarction ≤2 and myocardial blush grade ≤1 levels were significantly lower than those in the conventional dose group (P=0.01) or those in the control group (P=0.01), although the echocardiographic indicators of the three groups were not significantly different (P<0.05). Nevertheless, it was found that there were significantly fewer adverse cardiovascular events in the high-dose group (P<0.05 in both cases). During the follow-up period, thromboembolism and restenosis were most infrequent in the high-dose atorvastatin group. Based on our findings the oral administration of high-dose atorvastatin before bedtime, one day before the procedure, can effectively prevent no-reflow cases, reduce adverse events and improve the long-term prognosis for acute coronary syndrome patients after PCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.