Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28123224›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)2016

Access to Cancer Care and General Medical Care Services Among Cancer Survivors in the United States: An Analysis of 2011 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Data.

Janet S de Moor, Katherine S Virgo, Chunyu Li, Neetu Chawla, Xuesong Han, Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Donatus U Ekwueme, Timothy S McNeel, Juan L Rodriguez, K Robin Yabroff

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Shared Care During Breast and Colorectal Cancer Treatment: Is It Associated With Patient-Reported Care Quality?Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Janet S de MoorDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Katherine S VirgoDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Chunyu LiDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Neetu ChawlaDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Xuesong HanSurveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Danielle Blanch-HartiganDepartment of Natural and Applied Sciences, Bentley University, Waltham, MA, USA.
Donatus U EkwuemeDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Timothy S McNeelInformation Management Services, Inc, Calverton, MD, USA.
Juan L RodriguezDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
K Robin YabroffDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion · USNational Cancer Institute · USAmerican Cancer Society · USBentley University · USEmory University · USInformation Management Services · USKaiser Permanente · US

Funding

Research ProjectU54CA153499 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CHEN, MOON SHAO-CHUANG, CHOW, EDWARD A. · 2010 to 2015
$6.7M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCancer survivors require appropriate health care to manage their unique health needs. This study describes access to cancer care among cancer survivors in the United States and compares access to general medical care between cancer survivors and people who have no history of cancer.

methodsWe assessed access to general medical care using the core 2011 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). We assessed access to cancer care using the MEPS Experiences With Cancer Survey. We used multivariable logistic regression to compare access to general medical care among 2 groups of cancer survivors (those who reported having access to all necessary cancer care [n = 1088] and those who did not [n = 70]) with self-reported access to general medical care among people who had no history of cancer (n = 22 434).

resultsOf the 1158 cancer survivors, 70 (6.0%) reported that they did not receive all necessary cancer care. Adjusted analyses found that cancer survivors who reported not receiving all necessary cancer care were also less likely to report receiving general medical care (78.0%) than cancer survivors who reported having access to necessary cancer care (87.1%) and people who had no history of cancer (87.8%).

conclusionsThis study provides nationally representative data on the proportion of cancer survivors who have access to necessary cancer care and yields insight into factors that impede survivors' access to both cancer care and general medical care. This study is a reference for future work on access to care.

Indexed as

Health ExpendituresHealth Services AccessibilitySurvivorsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsUnited StatesYoung Adultaccess to carecancer carehealth services

Identifiers

PMID28123224
PMCPMC5230838
OpenAlexW2544151451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.