Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28123207›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)2016

Identifying Patients for Overdose Prevention With ICD-9 Classification in the Emergency Department, Massachusetts, 2013-2014.

Jacqueline Ellison, Alexander Y Walley, James A Feldman, Edward Bernstein, Patricia M Mitchell, Elisa A Koppelman, Mari-Lynn Drainoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Advancing emergency department-initiated buprenorphine.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Increased risk of new persistent opioid use in pediatric and young adult patients with kidney stones.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Implementation and Preliminary Results of an Emergency Department Nontargeted, Opt-out Hepatitis C Virus Screening Program.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jacqueline EllisonBoston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Alexander Y WalleyBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
James A FeldmanBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Edward BernsteinBoston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Patricia M MitchellBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Elisa A KoppelmanBoston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Mari-Lynn DrainoniBoston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The national rise in opioid overdose deaths signifies a need to integrate overdose prevention within healthcare delivery settings. The emergency department (ED) is an opportune location for such interventions. To effectively integrate prevention services, the target population must be clearly defined. We used ICD-9 discharge codes to establish and apply overdose risk categories to ED patients seen from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2014 at an urban safety-net hospital in Massachusetts with the goal of informing ED-based naloxone rescue kit distribution programs. Of 96,419 patients, 4,468 (4.6%) were at increased risk of opioid overdose, defined by prior opioid overdose, misuse, or polysubstance misuse. A small proportion of those at risk were prescribed opioids on a separate occasion. Use of risk categories defined by ICD-9 codes identified a notable proportion of ED patients at risk for overdose, and provides a systematic means to prioritize and direct clinical overdose prevention efforts.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDrug OverdoseEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansInternational Classification of DiseasesMaleMassachusettsMiddle AgedNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsOpioid-Related DisordersRisk AssessmentNaloxoneNarcotic Antagonistsdrug overdoseemergency medicineintervention

Identifiers

PMID28123207
PMCPMC5230809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.