ArticleSystematic biology2017
Split Scores: A Tool to Quantify Phylogenetic Signal in Genome-Scale Data.
Article in Systematic biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phlag: scalable detection of genomics regions with unexplained phylogenetic heterogeneity.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Parsimony and the rank of a flattening matrix.Journal of mathematical biology · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the Relative Performance of the Subflattenings Method for Phylogenetic Inference.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2023Article
- On the Need for New Measures of Phylogenomic Support.Systematic biology · 2022Article
- Spectral neighbor joining for reconstruction of latent tree Models.SIAM journal on mathematics of data science · 2021Article
- A Brief History of the Major Rickettsioses in the Asia-Australia-Pacific Region: A Capstone Review for the Special Issue ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2020Review
- HyDe: A Python Package for Genome-Scale Hybridization Detection.Systematic biology · 2018Article
- Cassava brown streak virus has a rapidly evolving genome: implications for virus speciation, variability, diagnosis and host resistance.Scientific reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Detecting variation in the evolutionary process along chromosomes is increasingly important as whole-genome data become more widely available. For example, factors such as incomplete lineage sorting, horizontal gene transfer, and chromosomal inversion are expected to result in changes in the underlying gene trees along a chromosome, while changes in selective pressure and mutational rates for different genomic regions may lead to shifts in the underlying mutational process. We propose the split score as a general method for quantifying support for a particular phylogenetic relationship within a genomic data set. Because the split score is based on algebraic properties of a matrix of site pattern frequencies, it can be rapidly computed, even for data sets that are large in the number of taxa and/or in the length of the alignment, providing an advantage over other methods (e.g., maximum likelihood) that are often used to assess such support. Using simulation, we explore the properties of the split score, including its dependence on sequence length, branch length, size of a split and its ability to detect true splits in the underlying tree. Using a sliding window analysis, we show that split scores can be used to detect changes in the underlying evolutionary process for genome-scale data from primates, mosquitoes, and viruses in a computationally efficient manner. Computation of the split score has been implemented in the software package SplitSup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.