Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28123021›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017

Differential Encoding of Time by Prefrontal and Striatal Network Dynamics.

Konstantin I Bakhurin, Vishwa Goudar, Justin L Shobe, Leslie D Claar, Dean V Buonomano, Sotiris C Masmanidis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Differential cannabinergic effects on temporal perception and production.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  5. The anticipation of imminent events is time-scale invariant.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Ramping cells in the rodent medial prefrontal cortex encode time to past and future events via real Laplace transform.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Konstantin I BakhurinNeuroscience Interdepartmental Program.
Vishwa GoudarDepartment of Neurobiology.
Justin L ShobeDepartment of Neurobiology.
Leslie D ClaarDepartment of Bioengineering.ORCID 0000-0002-4030-9171
Dean V BuonomanoDepartment of Neurobiology.ORCID 0000-0002-8528-9231
Sotiris C MasmanidisDepartment of Neurobiology, smasmanidis@ucla.edu.

Funding

The Role of Striosome Neurons in Mediating Opiod RewardP50DA005010 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FANSELOW, MICHAEL S · 1987 to 2021
$30.7M
TIMING AND LEARNING IN IN VITRO CORTICAL NETWORKSR01MH060163 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BUONOMANO, DEAN V · 2001 to 2019
$5.3M
Training Program in Neural MicrocircuitsT32NS058280 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FELDMAN, JACK L · 2007 to 2017
$2.4M
Systems-level electrophysiology for addiction and reward researchR01DA034178 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MASMANIDIS, SOTIRIS · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
CRCNS: Network mechanisms of the learning and encoding of timed motor responsesR01NS100050 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BUONOMANO, DEAN V, MASMANIDIS, SOTIRIS · 2016 to 2020
$1.5M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA005010NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA034178NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060163NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS100050NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS058280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telling time is fundamental to many forms of learning and behavior, including the anticipation of rewarding events. Although the neural mechanisms underlying timing remain unknown, computational models have proposed that the brain represents time in the dynamics of neural networks. Consistent with this hypothesis, changing patterns of neural activity dynamically in a number of brain areas-including the striatum and cortex-has been shown to encode elapsed time. To date, however, no studies have explicitly quantified and contrasted how well different areas encode time by recording large numbers of units simultaneously from more than one area. Here, we performed large-scale extracellular recordings in the striatum and orbitofrontal cortex of mice that learned the temporal relationship between a stimulus and a reward and reported their response with anticipatory licking. We used a machine-learning algorithm to quantify how well populations of neurons encoded elapsed time from stimulus onset. Both the striatal and cortical networks encoded time, but the striatal network outperformed the orbitofrontal cortex, a finding replicated both in simultaneously and nonsimultaneously recorded corticostriatal datasets. The striatal network was also more reliable in predicting when the animals would lick up to ∼1 s before the actual lick occurred. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that temporal information is encoded in a widely distributed manner throughout multiple brain areas, but that the striatum may have a privileged role in timing because it has a more accurate "clock" as it integrates information across multiple cortical areas. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The neural representation of time is thought to be distributed across multiple functionally specialized brain structures, including the striatum and cortex. However, until now, the neural code for time has not been compared quantitatively between these areas. Here, we performed large-scale recordings in the striatum and orbitofrontal cortex of mice trained on a stimulus-reward association task involving a delay period and used a machine-learning algorithm to quantify how well populations of simultaneously recorded neurons encoded elapsed time from stimulus onset. We found that, although both areas encoded time, the striatum consistently outperformed the orbitofrontal cortex. These results suggest that the striatum may refine the code for time by integrating information from multiple inputs.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnticipation, PsychologicalConditioning, PsychologicalCorpus StriatumMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNerve NetPrefrontal CortexTime Perceptiondecodingmachine-learning algorithmneural dynamicsorbitofrontal cortexstriatumtime coding

Identifiers

PMID28123021
PMCPMC5296780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.