ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017
Differential Encoding of Time by Prefrontal and Striatal Network Dynamics.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
87 citing papers in PubMed.
- Independence and coherence in temporal sequence computation across the fronto-parietal network.Nature communications · 2026Article
- A brain-wide, trial- and time-dependent deterministic drive synergizes with within-trial noise to time self-initiated actions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Hierarchical Distribution of Reward Representation in the Cortical and Hippocampal Regions.eNeuro · 2026Article
- Differential cannabinergic effects on temporal perception and production.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Article
- The anticipation of imminent events is time-scale invariant.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Article
- Complementary cortical and striatal encoding of locomotor preparation and performance.iScience · 2025Article
- Hippocampal sequences represent working memory and implicit timing.Cell reports · 2025Article
- Task-related activity in auditory cortex enhances sound representation.Science advances · 2025Article
- Learning Temporal Relationships Between Symbols with Laplace Neural Manifolds.Computational brain & behavior · 2025Article
- Medium Spiny Neurons Mediate Timing Perception in Coordination with Prefrontal Neurons in Primates.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Stable sequential dynamics in prefrontal cortex represents subjective estimation of time.eLife · 2024Article
- Ramping cells in the rodent medial prefrontal cortex encode time to past and future events via real Laplace transform.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Insights into the interaction between time and reward prediction on the activity of striatal tonically active neurons: A pilot study in rhesus monkeys.Physiological reports · 2024Article
- Excessive firing of dyskinesia-associated striatal direct pathway neurons is gated by dopamine and excitatory synaptic input.Cell reports · 2024Article
- Medial entorhinal cortex mediates learning of context-dependent interval timing behavior.Nature neuroscience · 2024Article
- Contributions of Basal Ganglia Circuits to Perception, Attention, and Consciousness.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2024Review
- Anti-Hebbian plasticity drives sequence learning in striatum.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Ramping cells in rodent mPFC encode time to past and future events via real Laplace transform.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Diverse Time Encoding Strategies Within the Medial Premotor Areas of the Primate.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Telling time is fundamental to many forms of learning and behavior, including the anticipation of rewarding events. Although the neural mechanisms underlying timing remain unknown, computational models have proposed that the brain represents time in the dynamics of neural networks. Consistent with this hypothesis, changing patterns of neural activity dynamically in a number of brain areas-including the striatum and cortex-has been shown to encode elapsed time. To date, however, no studies have explicitly quantified and contrasted how well different areas encode time by recording large numbers of units simultaneously from more than one area. Here, we performed large-scale extracellular recordings in the striatum and orbitofrontal cortex of mice that learned the temporal relationship between a stimulus and a reward and reported their response with anticipatory licking. We used a machine-learning algorithm to quantify how well populations of neurons encoded elapsed time from stimulus onset. Both the striatal and cortical networks encoded time, but the striatal network outperformed the orbitofrontal cortex, a finding replicated both in simultaneously and nonsimultaneously recorded corticostriatal datasets. The striatal network was also more reliable in predicting when the animals would lick up to ∼1 s before the actual lick occurred. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that temporal information is encoded in a widely distributed manner throughout multiple brain areas, but that the striatum may have a privileged role in timing because it has a more accurate "clock" as it integrates information across multiple cortical areas. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The neural representation of time is thought to be distributed across multiple functionally specialized brain structures, including the striatum and cortex. However, until now, the neural code for time has not been compared quantitatively between these areas. Here, we performed large-scale recordings in the striatum and orbitofrontal cortex of mice trained on a stimulus-reward association task involving a delay period and used a machine-learning algorithm to quantify how well populations of simultaneously recorded neurons encoded elapsed time from stimulus onset. We found that, although both areas encoded time, the striatum consistently outperformed the orbitofrontal cortex. These results suggest that the striatum may refine the code for time by integrating information from multiple inputs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.