Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28123019›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017

Cortical Correlates of the Auditory Frequency-Following and Onset Responses: EEG and fMRI Evidence.

Emily B J Coffey, Gabriella Musacchia, Robert J Zatorre

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Linguistic effect on speech perception observed at the brainstem.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sleep State Influences Early Sound Encoding at Cortical But Not Subcortical Levels.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Attentional Modulation of the Cortical Contribution to the Frequency-Following Response Evoked by Continuous Speech.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Frequency Selectivity of Persistent Cortical Oscillatory Responses to Auditory Rhythmic Stimulation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  20. Neural auditory contrast enhancement in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emily B J CoffeyMontreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3A 2B4, emz.coffey@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-8249-7396
Gabriella MusacchiaDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of the Pacific, Stockton, California 95207.ORCID 0000-0001-8895-9096
Robert J ZatorreMontreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3A 2B4.
Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital · CAUniversity of the Pacific · US

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The frequency-following response (FFR) is a measure of the brain's periodic sound encoding. It is of increasing importance for studying the human auditory nervous system due to numerous associations with auditory cognition and dysfunction. Although the FFR is widely interpreted as originating from brainstem nuclei, a recent study using MEG suggested that there is also a right-lateralized contribution from the auditory cortex at the fundamental frequency (Coffey et al., 2016b). Our objectives in the present work were to validate and better localize this result using a completely different neuroimaging modality and to document the relationships between the FFR, the onset response, and cortical activity. Using a combination of EEG, fMRI, and diffusion-weighted imaging, we show that activity in the right auditory cortex is related to individual differences in FFR-fundamental frequency (f SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The frequency-following response (FFR) is an EEG signal that is used to explore how the auditory system encodes temporal regularities in sound and is related to differences in auditory function between individuals. It is known that brainstem nuclei contribute to the FFR, but recent findings of an additional cortical source are more controversial. Here, we use fMRI to validate and extend the prediction from MEG data of a right auditory cortex contribution to the FFR. We also demonstrate a dissociation between FFR-related cortical activity from that related to the latency of the response to sound onset, which is found in left auditory cortex. The findings provide a clearer picture of cortical processes for analysis of sound features.

Indexed as

MusicAcoustic StimulationAdultAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRandom AllocationYoung Adultauditory cognitionEEGfMRIfrequency-following responseonset responsespectrotemporal processing

Identifiers

PMID28123019
PMCPMC6597017
OpenAlexW2949245885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.