Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28123017›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017

Spontaneous Neural Oscillations Bias Perception by Modulating Baseline Excitability.

Luca Iemi, Maximilien Chaumon, Sébastien M Crouzet, Niko A Busch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 149 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
149citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

149 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Identification of an optimal dose of intravenous ketamine for late-life treatment-resistant depression: a Bayesian adaptive randomization trial.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prior Expectations Bias Confidence Judgments Through Parietal Alpha-Band Modulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Spatiotemporal Divergence Between Intrinsic And Evoked Cortical Activity Predicts Visual Detection.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Alpha and Beta Corticomotor Phase Dynamics Shape Visuomotor Control on a Single-Trial Basis.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  15. Neural Mechanisms of Willed Attention Control.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Intrinsic Neural Timescales Relate to Event-Related Activity-Key Role for Intracolumnar Connections.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  18. Spontaneous Alpha-Band Lateralization Extends Persistence of Visual Information in Iconic Memory by Modulating Cortical Excitability.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

89 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luca IemiBerlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany, luca.iemi@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7178-2252
Maximilien ChaumonBerlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany.
Sébastien M CrouzetInstitute of Medical Psychology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0898-9557
Niko A BuschBerlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4837-0345

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain exhibits organized fluctuations of neural activity, even in the absence of tasks or sensory input. A prominent type of such spontaneous activity is the alpha rhythm, which influences perception and interacts with other ongoing neural activity. It is currently hypothesized that states of decreased prestimulus α oscillations indicate enhanced neural excitability, resulting in improved perceptual acuity. Nevertheless, it remains debated how changes in excitability manifest at the behavioral level in perceptual tasks. We addressed this issue by comparing two alternative models describing the effect of spontaneous α power on signal detection. The first model assumes that decreased α power increases baseline excitability, amplifying the response to both signal and noise, predicting a liberal detection criterion with no effect on sensitivity. The second model predicts that decreased α power increases the trial-by-trial precision of the sensory response, resulting in improved sensitivity. We tested these models in two EEG experiments in humans where we analyzed the effects of prestimulus α power on visual detection and discrimination using a signal detection framework. Both experiments provide strong evidence that decreased α power reflects a more liberal detection criterion, rather than improved sensitivity, consistent with the baseline model. In other words, when the task requires detecting stimulus presence versus absence, reduced α oscillations make observers more likely to report the stimulus regardless of actual stimulus presence. Contrary to previous interpretations, these results suggest that states of decreased α oscillations increase the global baseline excitability of sensory systems without affecting perceptual acuity. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Spontaneous fluctuations of brain activity explain why a faint sensory stimulus is sometimes perceived and sometimes not. The prevailing view is that heightened neural excitability, indexed by decreased α oscillations, promotes better perceptual performance. Here, we provide evidence that heightened neural excitability instead reflects a state of biased perception, during which a person is more likely to see a stimulus, whether or not it is actually present. Therefore, we propose that changes in neural excitability leave the precision of sensory processing unaffected. These results establish the link between spontaneous brain activity and the variability in human perception.

Indexed as

AdultAlpha RhythmBrainElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationVisual Perceptionalpha rhythmexcitabilityneural oscillationsperceptionsignal detection theoryspontaneous activity

Identifiers

PMID28123017
PMCPMC6597018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.