ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2017
Optimal delineation of single C-tactile and C-nociceptive afferents in humans by latency slowing.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modulation of pain by affective touch: effects of childhood trauma, depression, chronic pain, and spinal segment.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- Distinct effects of fibromyalgia pain, depression and anxiety on perception of affective touch and pain.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- Hybrid knowledge- and data-driven modelling for robust spike detection and sorting in human C-fiber microneurography.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Study protocol for microneurographic investigation of nociceptor sensitisation in fibromyalgia syndrome (MICRO-FMS).Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Emergent technologies in clinical neurophysiology to study the neuromuscular system: IFCN handbook chapter.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2026Review
- Review
- Robust coupling between the C-tactile afferent and the hair follicle in humans.The Journal of physiology · 2025Article
- In vivo calcium imaging reveals directional sensitivity of C-low threshold mechanoreceptors.The Journal of physiology · 2025Article
- Linking heartbeats with the cortical network dynamics involved in self-social touch distinction.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Fetal heart and surroundings: umbilical cord traction triggers sympathetic heart rate surge in fetal lambs in the artificial womb.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Ultraconformable cuff implants for long-term bidirectional interfacing of peripheral nerves at sub-nerve resolutions.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Nav1.7 is required for normal C-low threshold mechanoreceptor function in humans and mice.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2022Article
- Gentle stroking elicits somatosensory ERP that differentiates between hairy and glabrous skin.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2022Article
- Inhibition of current perception thresholds in A-delta and C fibers through somatosensory stimulation of the body surface.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Molecular and neural basis of pleasant touch sensation.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- A topographical and physiological exploration of C-tactile afferents and their response to menthol and histamine.Journal of neurophysiology · 2022Article
- The analgesic power of pleasant touch in individuals with chronic pain: Recent findings and new insights.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2022Review
- Studying human nociceptors: from fundamentals to clinic.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2021Review
- Pleasantness Only?Experimental psychology · 2020Article
- An ultrafast system for signaling mechanical pain in human skin.Science advances · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
C-mechanoreceptors in humans comprise a population of unmyelinated afferents exhibiting a wide range of mechanical sensitivities. C-mechanoreceptors are putatively divided into those signaling gentle touch (C-tactile afferents, CTs) and nociception (C-mechanosensitive nociceptors, CMs), giving rise to positive and negative affect, respectively. We sought to distinguish, compare, and contrast the properties of a population of human C-mechanoreceptors to see how fundamental the divisions between these putative subpopulations are. We used microneurography to record from individual afferents in humans and applied electrical and mechanical stimulation to their receptive fields. We show that C-mechanoreceptors can be distinguished unequivocally into two putative populations, comprising CTs and CMs, by electrically evoked spike latency changes (slowing). After both natural mechanical stimulation and repetitive electrical stimulation there was markedly less latency slowing in CTs compared with CMs. Electrical receptive field stimulation, which bypasses the receptor end organ, was most effective in classifying C-mechanoreceptors, as responses to mechanical receptive field stimulation overlapped somewhat, which may lead to misclassification. Furthermore, we report a subclass of low-threshold CM responding to gentle mechanical stimulation and a potential subclass of CT afferent displaying burst firing. We show that substantial differences exist in the mechanisms governing axonal conduction between CTs and CMs. We provide clear electrophysiological "signatures" (extent of latency slowing) that can be used in unequivocally identifying populations of C-mechanoreceptors in single-unit and multiunit microneurography studies and in translational animal research into affective touch. Additionally, these differential mechanisms may be pharmacologically targetable for separate modulation of positive and negative affective touch information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.