Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28123008›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurophysiology2017

The biology of skin wetness perception and its implications in manual function and for reproducing complex somatosensory signals in neuroprosthetics.

Davide Filingeri, Rochelle Ackerley

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Behaviour of a Harbour Seal (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Role of Play in the Social Development of Grey Seal (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  6. Thermal illusions for thermal displays: a review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  7. Regional skin wetness perception and its modulation by warm and cold whole body skin temperatures in people with multiple sclerosis.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Davide FilingeriEnvironmental Ergonomics Research Centre, Loughborough Design School, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom; d.filingeri3@lboro.ac.uk.
Rochelle AckerleyDepartment of Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden; and.
Aix-Marseille Université · FRLoughborough University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our perception of skin wetness is generated readily, yet humans have no known receptor (hygroreceptor) to signal this directly. It is easy to imagine the sensation of water running over our hands or the feel of rain on our skin. The synthetic sensation of wetness is thought to be produced from a combination of specific skin thermal and tactile inputs, registered through thermoreceptors and mechanoreceptors, respectively. The present review explores how thermal and tactile afference from the periphery can generate the percept of wetness centrally. We propose that the main signals include information about skin cooling, signaled primarily by thinly myelinated thermoreceptors, and rapid changes in touch, through fast-conducting, myelinated mechanoreceptors. Potential central sites for integration of these signals, and thus the perception of skin wetness, include the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices and the insula cortex. The interactions underlying these processes can also be modeled to aid in understanding and engineering the mechanisms. Furthermore, we discuss the role that sensing wetness could play in precision grip and the dexterous manipulation of objects. We expand on these lines of inquiry to the application of the knowledge in designing and creating skin sensory feedback in prosthetics. The addition of real-time, complex sensory signals would mark a significant advance in the use and incorporation of prosthetic body parts for amputees in everyday life.

Indexed as

Feedback, SensoryHumansMechanoreceptorsPhysical StimulationProstheses and ImplantsSignal Detection, PsychologicalSkinSkin TemperatureSomatosensory CortexThermoreceptorsTouchTouch Perceptionprostheticssensationtemperaturetouchwet

Identifiers

PMID28123008
PMCPMC5384974
OpenAlexW2582976013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.