Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28122953›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2017

Single-Step BLUP with Varying Genotyping Effort in Open-Pollinated

Blaise Ratcliffe, Omnia Gamal El-Dien, Eduardo P Cappa, Ilga Porth, Jaroslav Klápště, Charles Chen, Yousry A El-Kassaby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Tree genetics & genomes · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Efficient genetic value prediction using incomplete omics data.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Blaise RatcliffeDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4469-2929
Omnia Gamal El-DienDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9112-8522
Eduardo P CappaInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Instituto de Recursos Biológicos, Las Cabañas y De Los Reseros s/n, 1686 Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-6234-2263
Ilga PorthDépartment des Sciences du Bois et de la Forêt, Faculté de Foresterie, de Géographie et Géomatique, Université Laval Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9344-6348
Jaroslav KlápštěDepartment of Genetics and Physiology of Forest Trees, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 21 Praha 6, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-5504-3735
Charles ChenDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078-3035.ORCID 0000-0002-2203-0433
Yousry A El-KassabyDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada y.el-kassaby@ubc.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-4887-8977

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maximization of genetic gain in forest tree breeding programs is contingent on the accuracy of the predicted breeding values and precision of the estimated genetic parameters. We investigated the effect of the combined use of contemporary pedigree information and genomic relatedness estimates on the accuracy of predicted breeding values and precision of estimated genetic parameters, as well as rankings of selection candidates, using single-step genomic evaluation (HBLUP). In this study, two traits with diverse heritabilities [tree height (HT) and wood density (WD)] were assessed at various levels of family genotyping efforts (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100%) from a population of white spruce (

Indexed as

BreedingGenetic MarkersGenotyping TechniquesPedigreePiceaPollinationGenetic Markersbivariate mixed modelgenomic selectionGenPredHBLUPShared Data Resourcessingle-step BLUPtree improvement

Identifiers

PMID28122953
PMCPMC5345723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.