Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28122951›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2017

Linkage Mapping and Comparative Genomics of Red Drum (

Christopher M Hollenbeck, David S Portnoy, Dana Wetzel, Tracy A Sherwood, Paul B Samollow, John R Gold

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Population Genomics of the Blue Shark,Evolutionary applications · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christopher M HollenbeckMarine Genomics Laboratory, Department of Life Sciences, Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi, Texas 78412 ch263@st-andrews.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0227-7225
David S PortnoyMarine Genomics Laboratory, Department of Life Sciences, Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi, Texas 78412.
Dana WetzelMote Marine Laboratory and Aquarium, Sarasota, Florida 34236.
Tracy A SherwoodMote Marine Laboratory and Aquarium, Sarasota, Florida 34236.
Paul B SamollowDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77845.
John R GoldMarine Genomics Laboratory, Department of Life Sciences, Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi, Texas 78412.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developments in next-generation sequencing allow genotyping of thousands of genetic markers across hundreds of individuals in a cost-effective manner. Because of this, it is now possible to rapidly produce dense genetic linkage maps for nonmodel species. Here, we report a dense genetic linkage map for red drum, a marine fish species of considerable economic importance in the southeastern United States and elsewhere. We used a prior microsatellite-based linkage map as a framework and incorporated 1794 haplotyped contigs derived from high-throughput, reduced representation DNA sequencing to produce a linkage map containing 1794 haplotyped restriction-site associated DNA (RAD) contigs, 437 anonymous microsatellites, and 44 expressed sequence-tag-linked microsatellites (EST-SSRs). A total of 274 candidate genes, identified from transcripts from a preliminary hydrocarbon exposure study, were localized to specific chromosomes, using a shared synteny approach. The linkage map will be a useful resource for red drum commercial and restoration aquaculture, and for better understanding and managing populations of red drum in the wild.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAnimalsPerciformesSyntenygenetic maphaplotypesRAD-seqSNPssynteny

Identifiers

PMID28122951
PMCPMC5345714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.