Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28122579›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2017

The impact of benzodiazepine use in patients enrolled in opioid agonist therapy in Northern and rural Ontario.

Alexandra M Franklyn, Joseph K Eibl, Graham Gauthier, David Pellegrini, Nancy E Lightfoot, David C Marsh

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra M FranklynNorthern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada.
Joseph K EiblNorthern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada.
Graham GauthierNorthern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada.
David PellegriniNorthern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada.
Nancy E LightfootSchool of Rural and Northern Health, Laurentian University, 935 Ramsey Lake Rd., Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada.
David C MarshNorthern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada. dmarsh@nosm.ca.
NOSM University · CALaurentian University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBenzodiazepine use is common among patients in opioid agonist therapy; this puts patients at an increased risk of overdose and death. In this study, we examine the impact of baseline and ongoing benzodiazepine use, and whether patients are more likely to terminate treatment with increasing proportion of benzodiazepine positive urine samples. We also study whether benzodiazepine use differs by geographic location.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using anonymized electronic medical records from 58 clinics offering opioid agonist therapy in Ontario. One-year treatment retention was the primary outcome of interest and was measured for patients who did and did not have a benzodiazepine positive urine sample in their first month of treatment, and as a function of the proportion of benzodiazepine-positive urine samples throughout treatment. Cox proportional hazard model was used to characterize one-year retention.

resultsOur cohort consisted of 3850 patients, with the average retention rate of 43.4%. Baseline benzodiazepine users had a retention rate of 39.9% and non-users had a retention rate of 44%. Patients who were benzodiazepine negative on admission benefited from an increased median days retained of 265 vs. 215 days. Patients with more than 75% of urines positive for benzodiazepines were 175% more likely to drop out of treatment than those patients with little or no benzodiazepine use.

conclusionsBaseline benzodiazepine use is predictive of decreased retention. Patients who have a higher proportion of benzodiazepine-positive urine samples are more likely to drop out of treatment compared to those who have little or no benzodiazepine detection in their urine.

Indexed as

Opiate Substitution TreatmentAdultBenzodiazepinesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMethadoneOntarioOpioid-Related DisordersPatient DropoutsRetrospective StudiesRural PopulationTreatment OutcomeBenzodiazepinesMethadoneBenzodiazepinesConcurrent drug useNorthern OntarioOpioid agonist therapyTreatment retention

Identifiers

PMID28122579
PMCPMC5267412
OpenAlexW2582805122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.