Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28122568›Full record

ArticleTheoretical biology & medical modelling2017

Thermodynamic considerations in renal separation processes.

Robert H Louw, David M Rubin, David Glasser, Robyn F R Letts, Diane Hildebrandt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Theoretical biology & medical modelling, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert H LouwMaterials and Process Synthesis (MaPS) Research Unit, University of South Africa, Pioneer Avenue, Roodepoort, 1709, South Africa. rhlouw@gmail.com.
David M RubinBiomedical Engineering Research Group, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, University of the Witwatersrand, 1 Jan Smuts Avenue, Johannesburg, 2000, South Africa.
David GlasserMaterials and Process Synthesis (MaPS) Research Unit, University of South Africa, Pioneer Avenue, Roodepoort, 1709, South Africa.
Robyn F R LettsBiomedical Engineering Research Group, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, University of the Witwatersrand, 1 Jan Smuts Avenue, Johannesburg, 2000, South Africa.
Diane HildebrandtMaterials and Process Synthesis (MaPS) Research Unit, University of South Africa, Pioneer Avenue, Roodepoort, 1709, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrine production in the kidney is generally thought to be an energy-intensive process requiring large amounts of metabolic activity to power active transport mechanisms. This study uses a thermodynamic analysis to evaluate the minimum work requirements for urine production in the human kidney and provide a new perspective on the energy costs of urine production. In this study, black-box models are used to compare the Gibbs energy inflow and outflow of the overall kidney and physiologically-based subsections in the kidney, to calculate the work of separation for urine production.

resultsThe results describe the work done during urine production broadly and for specific scenarios. Firstly, it shows glomerular filtration in both kidneys requires work to be done at a rate of 5 mW under typical conditions in the kidney. Thereafter, less than 54 mW is sufficient to concentrate the filtrate into urine, even in the extreme cases considered. We have also related separation work in the kidney with the excretion rates of individual substances, including sodium, potassium, urea and water. Lastly, the thermodynamic calculations indicate that plasma dilution significantly reduces the energy cost of separating urine from blood.

conclusionsA comparison of these thermodynamic results with physiological reference points, elucidates how various factors affect the energy cost of the process. Surprisingly little energy is required to produce human urine, seeing that double the amount of work can theoretically be done with all the energy provided through pressure drop of blood flow through the kidneys, while the metabolic energy consumption of the kidneys could possibly drive almost one hundred times more separation work. Nonetheless, the model's outputs, which are summarised graphically, show the separation work's nuances, which can be further analysed in the context of more empirical evidence.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalThermodynamicsHumansKidneyOsmolar ConcentrationPotassiumRenal CirculationSodiumPotassiumSodiumEnergy balanceGibbs energyHuman kidneySensitivity analysisSeparation workUrine production

Identifiers

PMID28122568
PMCPMC5267413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.