ArticleBMC health services research2017
Why service users do not complain or have 'voice': a mixed-methods study from Nepal's rural primary health care system.
Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Health system responsiveness: a systematic evidence mapping review of the global literature.International journal for equity in health · 2021Pooled it
- Organisational responses to patient complaints in healthcare service delivery in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Assessing the operational effectiveness of village health volunteers in Thailand: A structural equation modeling analysis.Health promotion perspectives · 2025Article
- Article
- Contribution of health system governance in delivering primary health care services for universal health coverage: A scoping review.PloS one · 2025Article
- Power and positionality in the practice of health system responsiveness at sub-national level: insights from the Kenyan coast.International journal for equity in health · 2024Article
- Impact Analysis of COVID-19 Pandemic on Hospital Reviews on Dianping Website in Shanghai, China: Empirical Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- The perceived benefits and effectiveness of patient feedback systems in strengthening patient-provider relationships in Rural Tanzania.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Making health insurance responsive to citizens: the management of members' complaints by mutual health organisations in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- Health practitioner regulation and national health goals.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2023Article
- How does power shape district health management team responsiveness to public feedback in low- and middle-income countries: an interpretive synthesis.Health policy and planning · 2023Article
- "It's like asking for a necktie when you don't have underwear": Discourses on patient rights in southern Karnataka, India.International journal for equity in health · 2023Article
- Clients satisfaction at primary healthcare facilities and its association with implementation of client service charter in Tanzania.PloS one · 2022Article
- Patients' perception of safety climate in Irish general practice: a cross-sectional study.BMC family practice · 2021Article
- How do patient feedback systems work in low-income and middle-income countries? Insights from a realist evaluation in Bangladesh.BMJ global health · 2021Article
- Article
- Improving maternal health services through social accountability interventions in Nepal: an analytical review of existing literature.Public health reviews · 2020Review
- Article
- Nepal's Health Facility Operation and Management Committees: exploring community participation and influence in the Dang district's primary care clinics.Primary health care research & development · 2018Article
- A meta-ethnography of the facilitators and barriers to successful implementation of patient complaints processes in health-care settings.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite abundant literature on the different aspects of health care complaint management systems in high-income countries, little is known about this area in less developed health care systems and most research to date has been conducted in hospital settings. This article seeks to address this gap by reporting on research into complaint systems in primary health care (PHC) settings in Nepal.
methodsUsing a mixed-methods design, qualitative interviews were conducted with key informants (n = 39) and six community focus groups (n = 56), in the Dang District of Nepal. In addition, interviewer-administered structured questionnaire interviews were held with 400 service users, health facility operation and management committee (HFMC) members and service providers from 22 of the 39 public health facilities. Qualitative data were transcribed, organized and then analyzed using the framework method in QSR NVivo 10, while quantitative data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 22.
resultsDespite service users having grievances with the health system, they did not complain frequently: 9% (n = 20) reported ever making complaints about the PHC services. Complaints made were about medicines, health facility opening hours, health facility physical environment, and service providers, and were categorized into environment/equipment, accessibility/availability, level of empathy in the care process and care/safety. Generally, complaints were made verbally to health providers or to HFMC members or female community health volunteers. Use of formal channels such as suggestion boxes or written complaints was almost non-existent. Reasons reported for not complaining included: a lack of complaint channels; lack of knowledge of service entitlements; power asymmetry between service providers and service users; lack of opportunity to choose alternative providers, lack of an established culture of complaining, and a perceived lack of responsiveness to complaints.
conclusionVery few service users made complaints to PHC services in Nepal. Several contextual factors related to the community and the health system were identified as the reasons for not complaining. We recommend continuing efforts to establish proper complaints mechanisms with an increased emphasis on the existing community health system networks. Furthermore, awareness among service users about service entitlements and complaint mechanisms should be increased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.