Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28122342›Full record

SynthesisOncotarget2017

Prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology in resectable pancreatic cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Feng Cao, Jia Li, Ang Li, Fei Li

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05400681 (Pre- and Postoperative Incidence and Prognostic Implication of Positive Peritoneal Lavage and Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05400681 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Pre- and Postoperative Incidence and Prognostic Implication of Positive Peritoneal Lavage and Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorSonke DetlefsenRan2020 to 2024Enrolled200ConditionsPancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prognostic Value of Peritoneal Lavage Cytology in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Stratified by the Resectability Status.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  11. Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2021
    Review
  12. Predicting positive peritoneal cytology in pancreatic cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Feng CaoDepartment of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, PR China.
Jia LiDepartment of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, PR China.
Ang LiDepartment of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, PR China.
Fei LiDepartment of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, PR China.
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although peritoneal cytology has been used to determine pancreatic cancer staging for more than three decades, its prognostic significance in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer is inconclusive. We therefore conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the impact of peritoneal cytology status on the clinicopathological features and survival outcomes in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. Ten studies were identified for this meta-analysis after searching the PubMed, Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) electronic databases. Our results showed that positive peritoneal cytology was associated with tumor size (OR 11.65, P = 0.001), tumor location (OR 0.37, P = 0.000), serosal invasion (OR 3.89, P = 0.000), portal vein invasion (OR 1.82, P = 0.016), lymph vessel invasion (OR 2.71, P = 0.026), T stage (OR 2.65, P = 0.037) and N stage (OR 2.34, P = 0.001) in resectable pancreatic cancer. Patients with positive peritoneal cytology demonstrated poor overall survival (OS; HR 3.18, P = 0.000) and disease-free survival (DFS; HR 2.88, P = 0.000) times. Based on our meta-analysis, we conclude that positive peritoneal cytology is an indicator of advanced stage pancreatic cancer with a poor prognosis; hence, radical resection should not be performed on these patients.

Indexed as

CytodiagnosisHumansPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsPeritoneal NeoplasmsPeritoneumPrognosisSurvival Ratecytologymeta-analysisoverall survivalpancreatic cancersurgery

Identifiers

PMID28122342
PMCPMC5362462
OpenAlexW2575068379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.