Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28122335›Full record

Trial reportOncotarget2017

Detection of phosphatidylserine-positive exosomes as a diagnostic marker for ovarian malignancies: a proof of concept study.

Jayanthi Lea, Raghava Sharma, Fan Yang, Hong Zhu, E Sally Ward, Alan J Schroit

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Exosomes in Cancer: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jayanthi LeaHarold Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Raghava SharmaHamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Fan YangHamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Hong ZhuHarold Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
E Sally WardDepartment of Immunology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Alan J SchroitHarold Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Southwestern Medical CenterSouthwestern Medical Center · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

UT Southwestern Medical Center Simmons Comprehensive Cancer CenterP30CA142543 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Sandi Leigh Pruitt · 2010 to 2026
$53.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA142543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are no suitable screening modalities for ovarian carcinomas (OC) and repeated imaging and CA-125 levels are often needed to triage equivocal ovarian masses. Definitive diagnosis of malignancy, however, can only be established by histologic confirmation. Thus, the ability to detect OC at early stages is low, and most cases are diagnosed as advanced disease. Since tumor cells expose phosphatidylserine (PS) on their plasma membrane, we predicted that tumors might secrete PS-positive exosomes into the bloodstream that could be a surrogate biomarker for cancer. To address this, we developed a highly stringent ELISA that detects picogram quantities of PS in patient plasma. Blinded plasma from 34 suspect ovarian cancer patients and 10 healthy subjects were analyzed for the presence of PS-expressing vesicles. The nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test showed the malignant group had significantly higher PS values than the benign group (median 0.237 vs. -0.027, p=0.0001) and the malignant and benign groups had significantly higher PS values than the healthy group (median 0.237 vs -0.158, p<0.0001 and -0.027 vs -0.158, p=0.0002, respectively). ROC analysis of the predictive accuracy of PS-expressing exosomes/vesicles in predicting malignant against normal, benign against normal and malignant against benign revealed AUCs of 1.0, 0.95 and 0.911, respectively. This study provides proof-of-concept data that supports the high diagnostic power of PS detection in the blood of women with suspect ovarian malignancies.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, Clear CellAdenocarcinoma, MucinousAdultAgedArea Under CurveBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenCystadenocarcinoma, SerousEndometrial NeoplasmsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayExosomesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenPhosphatidylserinesexosomesextracellular vesiclesovarian malignanciesphosphatidylserine

Identifiers

PMID28122335
PMCPMC5362413
OpenAlexW2580746697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.