Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28122270›Full record

Trial reportDrug and alcohol dependence2017

A randomized controlled trial to influence client language in substance use disorder treatment.

Theresa B Moyers, Jon Houck, Lisa H Glynn, Kevin A Hallgren, Jennifer K Manuel

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Group motivational interviewing for homeless young adults: Associations of change talk with substance use and sexual risk behavior.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2017
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mechanisms of Motivational Interviewing: a Conceptual Framework to Guide Practice and Research.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Theresa B MoyersCenter on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions, MSC11 6280, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, United States. Electronic address: tmoyers@unm.edu.
Jon HouckCenter on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions, MSC11 6280, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, United States. Electronic address: jhouck@unm.edu.
Lisa H GlynnVA Puget Sound Health Care System, Department of Anesthesiology, 1660 S Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108, United States. Electronic address: Lisa.glynn2@va.gov.
Kevin A HallgrenUniversity of Washington Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195, United States. Electronic address: khallgre@uw.edu.
Jennifer K ManuelSan Francisco VA Medical Center and University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States. Electronic address: jennifer.manuel@va.gov.
University of New Mexico · USSan Francisco VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Washington · USVA Puget Sound Health Care System · US

Funding

Testing Theory-Based Training in Motivational InterviewingR01DA021227 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI MOYERS, THERESA B · 2007 to 2010
$1.9M
Imaging Brain Activity in Substance Use TreatmentK01AA021431 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI HOUCK, JON M. · 2013 to 2017
$837k
NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA021431NIDA NIH HHS L30 DA034353NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA021227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClient language is hypothesized to be a mechanism of action in motivational interviewing (MI). Despite the association of change and sustain talk with substance treatment outcomes, it not known whether providers can intentionally influence this language as hypothesized.

objectiveThis is a randomized controlled trial to investigate whether substance use providers can be trained to influence client language.

methodsTreatment providers specializing in substance use disorders (n=190) were randomly assigned to standard training in MI (MI-AU) or training emphasizing an influence of client language (MI-LEAF). Treatment sessions with actual clients were evaluated 3, 6 and 12 months after training by masked raters. Frequencies of client change and sustain talk were the outcome variables.

resultsSustain talk, but not change talk, was significantly lower in clients whose providers had received the specialized training (b=-0.175, SE=0.087, p=0.046, CI[-0.348 to 0.002], d=-0.325). Mediation analyses supported a causal chain between a) training, b) providers' attempts to minimize sustain talk in treatment sessions via directive reflective listening and c) client sustain talk in the treatment session (κ

conclusionsWith specialized training, providers can reduce the amount of opposition language their clients offer when considering a change in their substance use. Demonstrating that client language is under partial control of the provider supports the feasibility of clinical trials to investigate the impact of shaping client language on treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

LanguageAdultCounselingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivational InterviewingProfessional-Patient RelationsPsychotherapySubstance-Related DisordersSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeActive mechanismClient languageCounselor trainingMotivational interviewingRandomized controlled trialTechnical component

Identifiers

PMID28122270
PMCPMC5539943
OpenAlexW2575401534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.