SynthesisJournal of diabetes investigation2017
Association between particulate matter 2.5 and diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of cohort studies.
Synthesis in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review of environmentally persistent free radical (EPFR) formation, characteristics, and health effects: are there sufficient data for risk assessment?Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Exposure to particulate matters and risk of diabetes-related mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Environmental health and preventive medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Association of fine particulate matter (PMScientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- Association between exposure to ambient air pollution and semen quality in adults: a meta-analysis.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Pooled it
- Relationship between particulate matter exposure and female breast cancer incidence and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2021Pooled it
- The impact of particulate matter 2.5 on the risk of preeclampsia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020Pooled it
- The Effects of Fine Dust, Ozone, and Nitrogen Dioxide on Health.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2019Pooled it
- Association of Long-Term Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter and Cardio-Metabolic Diseases in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Pooled it
- Association between particulate matter 2.5 and diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of cohort studies.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2017Pooled it
- East Asia and high-income Asia Pacific burden of diabetes mellitus from 1990 to 2023.iScience · 2026Article
- Association Between Long-Term Exposure to Particulate Matter and Glycated Hemoglobin Levels: A Cohort Study from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Associations of Long-Term PM2.5 Exposure and Physical Activity Levels with Metabolic Syndrome and Health-Related Quality of Life: A Cross-Sectional Study in Chiang Mai, Thailand.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Hypothesis on the dust-borne atmospheric transport of Coccidioides, causative fungal pathogen for coccidioidomycosis (Valley fever).Medical mycology · 2026Article
- Spatial bayesian modeling of diabetes mellitus (DM) risk in the United States.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Health damages and disparities from municipal and medical waste incineration in Baltimore, USA.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Population Cohort-Validated PMToxics · 2025Article
- Exploring the link between environmental chemical exposures and epigenetic modifications in diabetes mellitus: A review.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Review
- The role of excess charge mitigation in electromagnetic hygiene: An integrative review.Biomedical journal · 2025Review
- Radon Exposure and Gestational Diabetes.JAMA network open · 2025Observational
- Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes in women of childbearing age, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis from the global burden of disease study 2021.Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Article
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AIMS/
introductionThe present meta-analysis was carried out to assess the association between exposure to the level of atmospheric particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5; fine particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 μm) and type 2 diabetes mellitus or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). MATERIALS AND
methodsWe searched the Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science databases to obtain articles according to the responding literature search strategies. Among a total of 279 identified articles, 55 were reviewed in depth, of which 10 articles (11 cohort studies) satisfied the inclusion criteria. Only cohort studies that disclosed the association between PM2.5 and type 2 diabetes mellitus or GDM were included in this article. A fixed-effects model was selected if P > 0.1 and I
resultsThe positive associations between PM2.5 and the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus were found in the long-term exposure period (relative risk 1.25, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.43), which showed that with every 10-μg/m
conclusionsLong-term exposure to PM2.5 would be more likely to lead to developing type 2 diabetes mellitus, but more studies would be required to confirm the association between PM2.5 and GDM. It might be a wise to take effective measures to reduce PM2.5 exposure in vulnerable populations, especially for pregnant women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.