Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28121914›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2017

Obtaining a male circumcision prevalence rate of 80% among adults in a short time: An observational prospective intervention study in the Orange Farm township of South Africa.

Esaie Marshall, Reathe Rain-Taljaard, Motlalepule Tsepe, Cornelius Monkwe, Dirk Taljaard, Florence Hlatswayo, Dumazile Xaba, Tebogo Molomo, Pascale Lissouba, Adrian Puren and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Esaie MarshallINSERM U1018, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris EA 4184, Faculty of Medicine, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France Progressus Research & Development CHAPS, Johannesburg, South Africa Médecins Sans Frontières, Paris, France National Institute for Communicable Diseases, National Health Laboratory Service Division of Virology, School of Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Paris Faculty of Medicine, University of Versailles-Saint Quentin, Versailles, France.
Reathe Rain-Taljaard
Motlalepule Tsepe
Cornelius Monkwe
Dirk Taljaard
Florence Hlatswayo
Dumazile Xaba
Tebogo Molomo
Pascale Lissouba
Adrian Puren
Bertran Auvert
Centre de recherche en Epidémiologie et Santé des Populations · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

World Health Organization recommends a target for the male circumcision prevalence rate of 80%. This rate will have a substantial impact on the human immunodeficiency virus-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome epidemic in Eastern and Southern Africa. The objective of the study was to assess whether an innovative intervention can lead to an increased voluntary male medical circumcision (VMMC) uptake among adults in a short time. This prospective observational study of a demand generation intervention was conducted in the township of Orange Farm (South Africa) in August to November 2015. In this community male circumcision prevalence rate among adults was stable between 2010 and 2015 at 55% and 57%, despite regular VMMC campaigns at community level and the presence of a VMMC clinic that offered free VMMC. The intervention took place in a random sample of 981 households where 522 men aged 18 to 49 years accepted to participate in the study. Among the 226 uncircumcised men, 212 accepted to be enrolled in the intervention study. A personal male circumcision adviser trained in interpersonal communication skills was assigned to each uncircumcised participant. The male circumcision advisers were trained to explain the risks and benefits of VMMC, and to discuss 24 possible reasons given by men for not being circumcised. Participants were then followed for 9 weeks. Each participant had a maximum of 3 motivational interviews at home. Participants who decided to be circumcised received financial compensation for their time equivalent to 2.5 days of work at the minimum South African salary rate. Among the 212 uncircumcised men enrolled in the intervention, 69.8% (148/212; 95% confidence interval [CI]; 63.4%-75.7%) agreed to be circumcised, which defines the uptake of the intervention. The male circumcision prevalence rate of the sample increased from 56.7% (296/522) to 81.4% (425/522; 77.9%-84.6%), P < 0.001, corresponding to a relative increase of 43.6% (95% CI: 35.4%-53.7%). The reported reasons for accepting circumcision were motivational interviews with the male circumcision adviser (83.1%), and time compensation (39.4%).Increased uptake of VMMC uptake can be obtained in a short time among adult males but requires an intense intervention centered on uncircumcised men at an individual level and time compensation.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultCircumcision, MaleHealth PromotionHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivational InterviewingPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrevalenceProspective StudiesSouth AfricaTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28121914
PMCPMC5287938
OpenAlexW2583044230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.