Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28121667›Full record

ArticleAIDS (London, England)2017

Improved kidney function in patients who switch their protease inhibitor from atazanavir or lopinavir to darunavir.

Sophie Jose, Mark Nelson, Andrew Phillips, David Chadwick, Roy Trevelion, Rachael Jones, Deborah I Williams, Lisa Hamzah, Caroline A Sabin, Frank A Post and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Kidney Disease in HIV: Moving beyond HIV-Associated Nephropathy.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sophie JoseaResearch Department of Infection and Population Health, University College LondonbChelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, LondoncSouth Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, MiddlesbroughdHIV I-Base, LondoneBrighton and Sussex University Hospitals, BrightonfKings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Mark Nelson
Andrew Phillips
David Chadwick
Roy Trevelion
Rachael Jones
Deborah I Williams
Lisa Hamzah
Caroline A Sabin
Frank A Post
UK CHIC study
Roland Hill (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2009-02-54Medical Research Council G0600337Medical Research Council G0900274Medical Research Council MR/M004236/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAtazanavir (ATV) and lopinavir (LPV) have been associated with kidney disease progression in HIV positive patients, with no data reported for darunavir (DRV). We examined kidney function in patients who switched their protease inhibitor from ATV or LPV to DRV.

designCohort study.

methodsData were from the UK CHIC study. We compared pre and post switch estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) slopes (expressed in ml/min per 1.73 m per year) in all switchers and those with rapid eGFR decline (>5 ml/min per 1.73 m per year) on ATV or LPV. Mixed-effects models were adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, eGFR at switch and time updated CD4 cell count, HIV RNA and cumulative tenofovir (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) exposure.

resultsData from 1430 patients were included. At the time of switching to DRV, median age was 45 years, 79% were men, 76% had an undetectable viral load, and median eGFR was 93 ml/min per 1.73 m. Adjusted mean (95% confidence interval) pre and post switch eGFR slopes were -0.84 (-1.31, -0.36) and 1.23 (0.80, 1.66) for ATV (P < 0.001), and -0.57 (-1.09, -0.05) and 0.62 (0.28, 0.96) for LPV (P < 0.001). Stable or improved renal function was observed in patients with rapid eGFR decline on ATV or LPV who switched to DRV [-15.27 (-19.35, -11.19) and 3.72 (1.78, 5.66), P < 0.001 for ATV, -11.93 (-14.60, -9.26) and 0.87 (-0.54, 2.27), P < 0.001 for LPV]. Similar results were obtained if participants who discontinued tenofovir disoproxil fumarate at the time of switch were excluded.

conclusionsWe report improved kidney function in patients who switched from ATV or LPV to DRV, suggesting that DRV may have a more favourable renal safety profile.

Indexed as

AdultAtazanavir SulfateCohort StudiesCytochrome P-450 CYP3A InhibitorsDarunavirFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHIV InfectionsHIV Protease InhibitorsHumansKidney DiseasesLopinavirMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomAtazanavir SulfateCytochrome P-450 CYP3A InhibitorsDarunavirHIV Protease InhibitorsLopinavir

Identifiers

PMID28121667
PMCPMC5278893
OpenAlexW2559862028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.