Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28121497›Full record

ReviewPhotomedicine and laser surgery2017

Effect of Photodynamic Antimicrobial Chemotherapy on Mono- and Multi-Species Cariogenic Biofilms: A Literature Review.

Maria Tayara Marques de Freitas, Talyta Teixeira Soares, Maria Gerusa Brito Aragão, Ramille Araújo Lima, Simone Duarte, Iriana Carla Junqueira Zanin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Photomedicine and laser surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Potentiation of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy with potassium iodide and methylene blue: targeting oral biofilm viability.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Photoinhibition ofDentistry journal · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Tayara Marques de Freitas1 Department of Microbiology, College of Dentistry, Federal University of Ceara , Sobral, Ceara, Brazil .
Talyta Teixeira Soares1 Department of Microbiology, College of Dentistry, Federal University of Ceara , Sobral, Ceara, Brazil .
Maria Gerusa Brito Aragão1 Department of Microbiology, College of Dentistry, Federal University of Ceara , Sobral, Ceara, Brazil .
Ramille Araújo Lima2 Department of Dental Clinics, School of Pharmacy, Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceara , Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil .
Simone Duarte3 Department of Basic Science and Craniofacial Biology, College of Dentistry, New York University , New York, New York.
Iriana Carla Junqueira Zanin1 Department of Microbiology, College of Dentistry, Federal University of Ceara , Sobral, Ceara, Brazil .
New York University · USUniversidade Federal do Ceará · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this literature review is to study the effect of photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (PACT) on mono- and multi-species cariogenic biofilms.

methodsTo this purpose, the database, PubMed, was searched using the descriptors, photodynamic therapy, antimicrobial photodynamic chemotherapy, and photoinactivation, associated with the mandatory presence of the word biofilm. A total of 98 references published from 2003 to 2016 were selected. Moreover, literature reviews (15), investigations that did not have biofilms related to dental caries (65), and those that did not have Streptococcus mutans count as an outcome (7) were excluded, yielding a final amount of 11 publications.

resultsThe results revealed that Toluidine Blue O was the most used photosensitizer. Among the sources of light, light-emitting diode was the choice, and the biofilm models varied between in vitro and in situ. Multi-species biofilms were more resistant to the antimicrobial effects of PACT due to the thickness and complexity they have, which impede the penetration of the photosensitizer. This fact may also be associated with the type of photosensitizer used as well as with the light exposure time since the antimicrobial effect seems to be dose dependent. Despite this, in all the included publications, the therapy was effective in reducing S. mutans count.

conclusionsThis review demonstrated that under different conditions, PACT is effective in reducing S. mutans count in monospecies biofilms. Multi-species biofilms were more resistant to the antimicrobial action of the therapy, possibly due to their thickness and complexity.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsDental CariesHumansPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsTolonium ChlorideAnti-Bacterial AgentsPhotosensitizing AgentsTolonium Chlorideantimicrobial photodynamic chemotherapycariesphotodynamic therapyphotoinactivationStreptococcus mutans

Identifiers

PMID28121497
PMCPMC5439435
OpenAlexW2584960343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.