Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28120840›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2017

Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of spinal muscular atrophy by relative haplotype dosage.

Michael Parks, Samantha Court, Benjamin Bowns, Siobhan Cleary, Samuel Clokie, Julie Hewitt, Denise Williams, Trevor Cole, Fiona MacDonald, Mike Griffiths and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Fetal gene therapy.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD): current and emerging technologies.Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Michael ParksWest Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8240-0603
Samantha CourtWest Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Benjamin BownsWest Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Siobhan ClearyWest Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Samuel ClokieWest Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Julie HewittWest Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Denise WilliamsWest Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Trevor ColeWest Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Fiona MacDonaldWest Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Mike GriffithsWest Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Stephanie AllenWest Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

Department of HealthWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although technically possible, few clinical laboratories across the world have implemented non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) for selected single-gene disorders, mostly owing to the elevated costs incurred. Having previously proven that NIPD for X-linked disorders can be feasibly implemented in clinical practice, we have now developed a test for the NIPD of an autosomal-recessive disorder, spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Cell-free DNA was extracted from maternal blood and prepared for massively parallel sequencing on an Illumina MiSeq by targeted capture enrichment of single-nucleotide polymorphisms across a 6 Mb genomic window on chromosome 5 containing the SMN1 gene. Maternal, paternal and proband DNA samples were also tested for haplotyping purposes. Sequencing data was analysed by relative haplotype dosage (RHDO). Six pregnant SMA carriers and 10 healthy pregnant donors were recruited through the NIPSIGEN study. Inheritance of the maternally and paternally derived alleles of the affected SMN1 gene was determined in the foetus by RHDO analysis for autosomal-recessive disorders. DNA from the proband (for SMA carriers) or an invasively obtained foetal sample (for healthy pregnant donors) was used to identify the maternal and paternal reference haplotypes associated with the affected SMN1 gene. Results for all patients correlated with known outcomes and showed a testing specificity and sensitivity of 100%. On top of showing high accuracy and reliability throughout the stages of validation, our novel test for NIPD of SMA is also affordable and viable for implementation into clinical service.

Indexed as

HaplotypesCase-Control StudiesFemaleGenetic TestingHeterozygoteHumansMaleMuscular Atrophy, SpinalPedigreePolymorphism, Single NucleotidePregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisSensitivity and SpecificitySurvival of Motor Neuron 1 ProteinSMN1 protein, humanSurvival of Motor Neuron 1 Protein

Identifiers

PMID28120840
PMCPMC5386415
OpenAlexW2581070142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.