Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28120324›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2017

Activity of weekly paclitaxel-cetuximab chemotherapy in unselected patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: prognostic factors.

I Pajares Bernad, J Martínez Trufero, L Calera Urquizu, R A Pazo Cid, A Cebollero de Miguel, M J Agustin, M Lanzuela, A Antón

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Anti-EGFR treatment effects on laryngeal cancer stem cells.American journal of translational research · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

I Pajares BernadMedical Oncology Department, Miguel Servet University Hospital, 1-3 Isabel la Catolica Avenue, 50009, Saragossa, Spain. ispaber@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4825-4977
J Martínez TruferoMedical Oncology Department, Miguel Servet University Hospital, 1-3 Isabel la Catolica Avenue, 50009, Saragossa, Spain.
L Calera UrquizuMedical Oncology Department, Miguel Servet University Hospital, 1-3 Isabel la Catolica Avenue, 50009, Saragossa, Spain.
R A Pazo CidMedical Oncology Department, Miguel Servet University Hospital, 1-3 Isabel la Catolica Avenue, 50009, Saragossa, Spain.
A Cebollero de MiguelMedical Oncology Department, Miguel Servet University Hospital, 1-3 Isabel la Catolica Avenue, 50009, Saragossa, Spain.
M J AgustinPharmacy Department, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Saragossa, Spain.
M LanzuelaRadiotherapy Department, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Saragossa, Spain.
A AntónMedical Oncology Department, Miguel Servet University Hospital, 1-3 Isabel la Catolica Avenue, 50009, Saragossa, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStandard treatment for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RM-SCCHN) is based in on platinum and cetuximab combination therapy. Unfortunately, not all patients are candidates to receive platinum-based treatment, because of different conditions as comorbidity and poor performance status. Weekly paclitaxel and cetuximab (WPC) is an active therapeutic alternative, based on a phase II study, with less toxicity. Our main objective is to confirm its activity in unselected patients, mostly unfit for aggressive therapies, analysing also some clinically relevant prognostic factors (PFs).

methodsRetrospective data was collected for RM-SCCHN patients, treated at our institution between January 2008 and July 2014 with weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m

results148 patients were treated. The objective response rate (OR) was as follows: 13 patients (8.78%) complete response (CR); 57 patients (38.51%) partial response (PR) and 30 patients (20.3%) stable disease (SD). Median overall survival (OS) was 10 months (95% CI 8.31-11.69) and median progression free survival (PFS) was 7 months (95% CI 5.88-8.12). Response to treatment showed independent prognosis relevance as PF in multivariate analysis for PFS and OS. Furthermore, decline in serum magnesium during the treatment was also an independent PF for OS.

conclusionsWPC activity was confirmed as a useful therapy on real-life unselected RM-SCCHN patients, with similar benefit to that obtained in the phase II study, and comparable to platinum and cetuximab based treatment, confirming its value in unfit patients. In addition to treatment response, a change in serum magnesium values during treatment was proved as independent PF on OS.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Squamous CellCetuximabDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPaclitaxelPrognosisCetuximabPaclitaxelHead and neck squamous cell carcinomaPrognostic factorsRecurrent metastaticSerum magnesiumWeekly paclitaxel cetuximab

Identifiers

PMID28120324
OpenAlexW2580411187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.