Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28120168›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2017

Self-care of long-term conditions: patients' perspectives and their (limited) use of community pharmacies.

Oladapo J Ogunbayo, Ellen I Schafheutle, Christopher Cutts, Peter R Noyce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patient and public perspectives of community pharmacies in the United Kingdom: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Oladapo J OgunbayoCentre for Pharmacy Workforce Studies (CPWS), Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Stopford building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
Ellen I SchafheutleCentre for Pharmacy Workforce Studies (CPWS), Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Stopford building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK. ellen.schafheutle@manchester.ac.uk.
Christopher CuttsCentre for Pharmacy Postgraduate Education (CPPE), Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Stopford building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
Peter R NoyceCentre for Pharmacy Workforce Studies (CPWS), Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Stopford building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Self-care support is an 'inseparable' component of quality healthcare for long-term conditions (LTCs). Evidence of how patients view and use community pharmacy (CP) to engage in self-care of LTCs is limited. Objective To explore patients' perspectives of engaging in self-care and use of CP for self-care support. Setting England and Scotland. Method Qualitative design employing semi-structured interviews. LTCs patients were recruited via general practitioners (GPs) and CPs. Interviews were conducted between May 2013 and June 2014; they were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. Results Twenty-four participants were interviewed. Three main themes emerged: engaging in self-care, resources for self-care support and (limited) use of community pharmacy. Participants' LTC 'lived experience' showed that self-care was integral to daily living from being diagnosed to long-term maintenance of health/wellbeing; self-care engagement was very personal and diverse and was based on beliefs and experiences. Healthcare professionals were viewed as providing information which was considered passive and insufficient in helping behavioural change. Non-healthcare sources (family, carers, friends, internet) were important in filling active support gaps, particularly lifestyle management. Participants' use of, and identified need for, community pharmacy as a resource for self-care support of LTCs was limited and primarily focussed on medicines supply. There was low awareness and visibility of CPs' potential roles and capability. Conclusion CP needs to reflect on patients' low awareness of its expertise and services to contribute to self-care support of LTCs. Rethinking how interventions are designed and 'marketed'; incorporation of patients' perspectives and collaboration with others, particularly GPs, could prove beneficial.

Indexed as

Community Pharmacy ServicesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareQualitative ResearchSelf CareYoung AdultCommunity pharmacyHealthcare professionalsLong-term conditionsPatient perspectiveQualitative interviewsSelf-careUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID28120168
PMCPMC5371633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.