Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28120136›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2017

Evaluating Mental Health Literacy in the Workplace: Development and Psychometric Properties of a Vignette-Based Tool.

Sandra Moll, Mona Zanhour, Scott B Patten, Heather Stuart, Joy MacDermid

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05429619 (Advancing Peer Support Programming to Address PTSD and Trauma Among Canadian Public Safety Personnel and Veterans), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05429619 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Advancing Peer Support Programming to Address PTSD and Trauma Among Canadian Public Safety Personnel and Veterans

TypeobservationalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled950ConditionsMental Health Issue, Mental Stress, Post Traumatic Stress DisorderArmsPeerOnCall
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Corporate Application of Health Literacy.Health literacy research and practice · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Work-Related Health Literacy: A Scoping Review to Clarify the Concept.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sandra MollSchool of Rehabilitation Science, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1400 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 1C7, Canada. molls@mcmaster.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-1937-0103
Mona ZanhourCollege of Business Administration, California State University, Long Beach, Long Beach, CA, USA.
Scott B PattenDepartment of Community Health Sciences & Psychiatry, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive N.W., Calgary, AB, T2N 4N1, Canada.
Heather StuartCentre for Health Services and Policy Research, Queen's University, 21 Arch Street, Room 324B, Abramsky Hall, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Joy MacDermidSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 1C7, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Early intervention and support for workers with mental health problems may be influenced by the mental health literacy of the worker, their colleagues and their supervisor. There are gaps, however, in our understanding of how to develop and evaluate mental health literacy within the context of the workplace. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a new Mental Health Literacy tool for the Workplace (MHL-W). Methods The MHL-W is a 16-question, vignette-based tool specifically tailored for the workplace context. It includes four vignettes featuring different manifestations of mental ill-health in the workplace, with parallel questions that explore each of the four dimensions of mental health literacy. In order to establish reliability and construct validity, data were collected from 192 healthcare workers who were participating in a mental health training project. Baseline data was used to examine the scale's internal consistency, factor structure and correlations with general knowledge ratings, confidence ratings, attitudes towards people with mental illness, and attitudes towards seeking help. Paired t-tests were used to examine pre and post intervention scores in order to establish responsiveness of the scale. Results There was strong support for internal consistency of the tool and a one-factor solution. As predicted, the scores correlated highly with an overall rating of knowledge and confidence in addressing mental health issues, and moderately with attitudes towards seeking professional help and (decreased) stigmatized beliefs. It also appears to be responsive to change. Conclusions The MHL-W scale is promising tool to track the need for and impact of mental health education in the workplace.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth LiteracyAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHelp-Seeking BehaviorHumansMaleMental HealthOccupational HealthPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesEducational measurementHealth literacyOccupational healthPsychometricsWork performance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.