Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28120011›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2017

Effort provides its own reward: endeavors reinforce subjective expectation and evaluation of task performance.

Lei Wang, Jiehui Zheng, Liang Meng

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Effort Paradox: Effort Is Both Costly and Valued.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lei WangSchool of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Jiehui ZhengSchool of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Liang MengSchool of Business and Management, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, China. promise_land@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0470-7818

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although many studies have investigated the relationship between the amount of effort invested in a certain task and one's attitude towards the subsequent reward, whether exerted effort would impact one's expectation and evaluation of performance feedback itself still remains to be examined. In the present study, two types of calculation tasks that varied in the required effort were adopted, and we resorted to electroencephalography to probe the temporal dynamics of how exerted effort would affect one's anticipation and evaluation of performance feedback. In the high-effort condition, a more salient stimulus-preceding negativity was detected during the anticipation stage, which was accompanied with a more salient FRN/P300 complex (a more positive P300 and a less negative feedback-related negativity) in response to positive outcomes in the evaluation stage. These results suggested that when more effort was invested, an enhanced anticipatory attention would be paid toward one's task performance feedback and that positive outcomes would be subjectively valued to a greater extent.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyRewardTask Performance and AnalysisAdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceElectroencephalographyElectrooculographyEvent-Related Potentials, P300Feedback, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationTime FactorsYoung AdultAnticipationEffortEvent-related potentialFeedback-related negativityRewardStimulus-preceding negativity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.