Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28119699›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2016

Proso Millet (

Cedric Habiyaremye, Janet B Matanguihan, Jade D'Alpoim Guedes, Girish M Ganjyal, Michael R Whiteman, Kimberlee K Kidwell, Kevin M Murphy

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 243 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Role of Millets for Food Security Under Climate Change.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Phenotypic Variation of 933 Broomcorn Millet (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genome-wide identification and analysis of theFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cedric HabiyaremyeSustainable Seed Systems Lab, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, College of Agricultural, Human, and Natural Resource Sciences, Washington State University Pullman, WA, USA.
Janet B MatanguihanSustainable Seed Systems Lab, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, College of Agricultural, Human, and Natural Resource Sciences, Washington State University Pullman, WA, USA.
Jade D'Alpoim GuedesDepartment of Anthropology, Washington State University Pullman, WA, USA.
Girish M GanjyalFood Processing Lab, School of Food Science, College of Agricultural, Human, and Natural Resource Sciences, Washington State University Pullman, WA, USA.
Michael R WhitemanInternational Programs, International Research and Agricultural Development, Washington State University Pullman, WA, USA.
Kimberlee K KidwellCollege of Agricultural, Consumer, and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana, IL, USA.
Kevin M MurphySustainable Seed Systems Lab, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, College of Agricultural, Human, and Natural Resource Sciences, Washington State University Pullman, WA, USA.
Washington State University · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proso millet

Indexed as

alternative cropsdiversificationgeneticsnutrition and health benefitsPacific Northwestproso millet

Identifiers

PMID28119699
PMCPMC5220228
OpenAlexW2569535730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.