Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28119183›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2017

Word and object recognition during reading acquisition: MEG evidence.

Sendy Caffarra, Clara D Martin, Mikel Lizarazu, Marie Lallier, Asier Zarraga, Nicola Molinaro, Manuel Carreiras

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neural Distinction between Visual Word and Object Recognition: An fMRI Study Using Pictographs.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  2. Automaticity in the reading circuitry.Brain and language · 2021
    Article
  3. Flux of life.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sendy CaffarraBCBL, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, Mikeletegi 69, Donostia 20009, Spain. Electronic address: s.caffarra@bcbl.eu.
Clara D MartinBCBL, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, Mikeletegi 69, Donostia 20009, Spain; Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science, Maria Diaz de Haro 3, Bilbao 48013, Spain.
Mikel LizarazuBCBL, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, Mikeletegi 69, Donostia 20009, Spain.
Marie LallierBCBL, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, Mikeletegi 69, Donostia 20009, Spain.
Asier ZarragaBCBL, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, Mikeletegi 69, Donostia 20009, Spain.
Nicola MolinaroBCBL, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, Mikeletegi 69, Donostia 20009, Spain; Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science, Maria Diaz de Haro 3, Bilbao 48013, Spain.
Manuel CarreirasBCBL, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, Mikeletegi 69, Donostia 20009, Spain; Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science, Maria Diaz de Haro 3, Bilbao 48013, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies on adults suggest that reading-induced brain changes might not be limited to linguistic processes. It is still unclear whether these results can be generalized to reading development. The present study shows to which extent neural responses to verbal and nonverbal stimuli are reorganized while children learn to read. MEG data of thirty Basque children (4-8y) were collected while they were presented with written words, spoken words and visual objects. The evoked fields elicited by the experimental stimuli were compared to their scrambled counterparts. Visual words elicited left posterior (200-300ms) and temporal activations (400-800ms). The size of these effects increased as reading performance improved, suggesting a reorganization of children's visual word responses. Spoken words elicited greater left temporal responses relative to scrambles (300-700ms). No evidence for the influence of reading expertise was observed. Brain responses to objects were greater than to scrambles in bilateral posterior regions (200-500ms). There was a greater left hemisphere involvement as reading errors decreased, suggesting a strengthened verbal decoding of visual configurations with reading acquisition. The present results reveal that learning to read not only influences written word processing, but also affects visual object recognition, suggesting a non-language specific impact of reading on children's neural mechanisms.

Indexed as

ReadingChildFemaleHumansMaleSpeech PerceptionVisual PerceptionMEGObject recognitionReading acquisitionSpeech processingVisual word recognition

Identifiers

PMID28119183
PMCPMC5437840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.