ReviewJournal of chromatography. A2017
Recommendations for quantitative analysis of small molecules by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry.
Review in Journal of chromatography. A, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimisation of a Topical Miltefosine Carbopol-Based Gel for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: Antileishmanial Activity After Storage and Drug Response.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- MALDI Matrix: Origins, Innovations, and Frontiers.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Influence of Acceleration Field and Inlet Temperature on Ion Yields of Small Molecules in Atmospheric Pressure MALDI.International journal of mass spectrometry · 2026Article
- Review
- Doped nanomaterial facilitates 3D printing target plate for rapid detection of alkaloids in laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2023Article
- Review
- Identification of dipeptides by MALDI-ToF mass spectrometry in long-processing Spanish dry-cured ham.Food chemistry. Molecular sciences · 2021Article
- MALDI-MS-based biomarker analysis of extracellular vesicles from human lung carcinoma cells.RSC advances · 2021Article
- Applications of stable isotopes in MALDI imaging: current approaches and an eye on the future.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2021Review
- Jettison-MS of Nucleic Acid Species.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2020Article
- In-Droplet Electrophoretic Separation and Enrichment of Biomolecules.Analytical chemistry · 2020Article
- Gold Nanoparticles (AuNPs) as Reactive Matrix for Detection of Trace Levels of HCN in Air by Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry (LDI-MS).Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2019Article
- Molecular species fingerprinting and quantitative analysis of saffron (RSC advances · 2018Article
- Ionic Liquid-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Mass Spectrometry: Matrices, Microextraction, and Separation.Methods and protocols · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) has been used for quantitative analysis of small molecules for many years. It is usually preceded by an LC separation step when complex samples are tested. With the development several years ago of "modern MALDI" (automation, high repetition laser, high resolution peaks), the ease of use and performance of MALDI as a quantitative technique greatly increased. This review focuses on practical aspects of modern MALDI for quantitation of small molecules conducted in an ordinary way (no special reagents, devices or techniques for the spotting step of MALDI), and includes our ordinary, preferred methods The review is organized as 18 recommendations with accompanying explanations, criticisms and exceptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.