ReviewAnimal : an international journal of animal bioscience2017
Review: divergent selection for residual feed intake in the growing pig.
Review in Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bayesian Genome-Wide Association Study of Feed Efficiency Traits in Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Residual feed intake in laying hens during the late laying period: associations with nutrient utilization, antioxidant capacity, and gut barrier function.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Modest contribution of metabolomic data to genomic prediction of breeding values for feed conversion ratio in pigs.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Identification of central regulators related to residual feed intake in Huainan chickens based on weighted gene co-expression network analysis.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Genetic parameters for feed efficiency, growth performance, and feeding behaviors traits in Canadian Duroc pigs.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Article
- Leptin receptor gene influences pig gut microbiota both through feed intake and independently.Animal microbiome · 2025Article
- Identification of Fecal Microbiota and Related Metabolites Associated with Feed Efficiency in DLY Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Breed- and Line-Dependent Severity of Inflammation and Necrosis Syndrome in AI Boars, and the Related Risk of Inflammation and Necrosis in Their Progeny.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Novel models for estimating metabolizable energy intake of pigs based on body weight and ambient temperature.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Heat Production of Iberian Pig Exposed to High Temperature and Effect of Dietary Supplementation with Betaine or Zinc.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Mulberry Leaf Dietary Supplementation Can Improve the Lipo-Nutritional Quality of Pork and Regulate Gut Microbiota in Pigs: A Comprehensive Multi-Omics Analysis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Article
- Comparison of differences in performance between pigs whose sires were identified using different selection strategies after experimental infection with PRRSV.Translational animal science · 2024Article
- Livestock species as emerging models for genomic imprinting.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Review
- Disentangling the dynamics of energy allocation to develop a proxy for robustness of fattening pigs.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- Article
- Association analysis of mitochondrial genome polymorphisms with backfat thickness in pigs.Animal biotechnology · 2023Article
- Productive Performance, Physiological Variables, and Carcass Quality of Finishing Pigs Supplemented with Ferulic Acid and Grape Pomace under Heat Stress Conditions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- PlasmaScientific reports · 2023Article
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review summarizes the results from the INRA (Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique) divergent selection experiment on residual feed intake (RFI) in growing Large White pigs during nine generations of selection. It discusses the remaining challenges and perspectives for the improvement of feed efficiency in growing pigs. The impacts on growing pigs raised under standard conditions and in alternative situations such as heat stress, inflammatory challenges or lactation have been studied. After nine generations of selection, the divergent selection for RFI led to highly significant (P<0.001) line differences for RFI (-165 g/day in the low RFI (LRFI) line compared with high RFI line) and daily feed intake (-270 g/day). Low responses were observed on growth rate (-12.8 g/day, P<0.05) and body composition (+0.9 mm backfat thickness, P=0.57; -2.64% lean meat content, P<0.001) with a marked response on feed conversion ratio (-0.32 kg feed/kg gain, P<0.001). Reduced ultimate pH and increased lightness of the meat (P<0.001) were observed in LRFI pigs with minor impact on the sensory quality of the meat. These changes in meat quality were associated with changes of the muscular energy metabolism. Reduced maintenance energy requirements (-10% after five generations of selection) and activity (-21% of time standing after six generations of selection) of LRFI pigs greatly contributed to the gain in energy efficiency. However, the impact of selection for RFI on the protein metabolism of the pig remains unclear. Digestibility of energy and nutrients was not affected by selection, neither for pigs fed conventional diets nor for pigs fed high-fibre diets. A significant improvement of digestive efficiency could likely be achieved by selecting pigs on fibre diets. No convincing genetic or blood biomarker has been identified for explaining the differences in RFI, suggesting that pigs have various ways to achieve an efficient use of feed. No deleterious impact of the selection on the sow reproduction performance was observed. The resource allocation theory states that low RFI may reduce the ability to cope with stressors, via the reduction of a buffer compartment dedicated to responses to stress. None of the experiments focussed on the response of pigs to stress or challenges could confirm this theory. Understanding the relationships between RFI and responses to stress and energy demanding processes, as such immunity and lactation, remains a major challenge for a better understanding of the underlying biological mechanisms of the trait and to reconcile the experimental results with the resource allocation theory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.