Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28118840›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2017

Quality of care in the intensive care unit from the perspective of patient's relatives: development and psychometric evaluation of the consumer quality index 'R-ICU'.

Ans Rensen, Margo M van Mol, Ilse Menheere, Marjan D Nijkamp, Ellen Verhoogt, Bea Maris, Willeke Manders, Lilian Vloet, Lisbeth Verharen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ans RensenDepartment of Emergency and Critical care, Faculty of Health, Behavior and Society, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Postbox 6960, 6503, GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. ans.rensen@han.nl.
Margo M van MolDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center's, Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ilse MenheereDepartment of Emergency and Critical care, Faculty of Health, Behavior and Society, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Postbox 6960, 6503, GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marjan D NijkampFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences-Open University of the Netherlands, Valkenburgerweg 177, 6419 AT, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Ellen VerhoogtMedical Center Spaarne Gasthuis, Vondelweg 999, 2026 BW, Haarlem, Netherlands.
Bea MarisMedical Center Gelderse Vallei, Willy Brandtlaan 10, 6716 RP, Ede, The Netherlands.
Willeke MandersDepartment of Emergency and Critical care, Faculty of Health, Behavior and Society, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Postbox 6960, 6503, GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Lilian VloetDepartment of Emergency and Critical care, Faculty of Health, Behavior and Society, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Postbox 6960, 6503, GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Lisbeth VerharenDepartment of Emergency and Critical care, Faculty of Health, Behavior and Society, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Postbox 6960, 6503, GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe quality standards of the Dutch Society of Intensive Care require monitoring of the satisfaction of patient's relatives with respect to care. Currently, no suitable instrument is available in the Netherlands to measure this. This study describes the development and psychometric evaluation of the questionnaire-based Consumer Quality Index 'Relatives in Intensive Care Unit' (CQI 'R-ICU'). The CQI 'R-ICU' measures the perceived quality of care from the perspective of patients' relatives, and identifies aspects of care that need improvement.

methodsThe CQI 'R-ICU' was developed using a mixed method design. Items were based on quality of care aspects from earlier studies and from focus group interviews with patients' relatives. The time period for the data collection of the psychometric evaluation was from October 2011 until July 2012. Relatives of adult intensive care patients in one university hospital and five general hospitals in the Netherlands were approached to participate. Psychometric evaluation included item analysis, inter-item analysis, and factor analysis.

resultsTwelve aspects were noted as being indicators of quality of care, and were subsequently selected for the questionnaire's vocabulary. The response rate of patients' relatives was 81% (n = 455). Quality of care was represented by two clusters, each showing a high reliability: 'Communication' (α = .80) and 'Participation' (α = .84). Relatives ranked the following aspects for quality of care as most important: no conflicting information, information from doctors and nurses is comprehensive, and health professionals take patients' relatives seriously. The least important care aspects were: need for contact with peers, nuisance, and contact with a spiritual counsellor. Aspects that needed the most urgent improvement (highest quality improvement scores) were: information about how relatives can contribute to the care of the patient, information about the use of meal-facilities in the hospital, and involvement in decision-making on the medical treatment of the patient.

conclusionsThe CQI 'R-ICU' evaluates quality of care from the perspective of relatives of intensive care patients and provides practical information for quality assurance and improvement programs. The development and psychometric evaluation of the CQI 'R-ICU' led to a draft questionnaire, sufficient to justify further research into the reliability, validity, and the discriminative power of the questionnaire.

Indexed as

Critical CareAdolescentAdultAgedDecision MakingFamilyFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsOutcome Assessment, Health CarePersonal SatisfactionPsychometricsConsumer quality indexConsumer satisfactionFamily memberIntensive care unitQuality of healthcareRelative

Identifiers

PMID28118840
PMCPMC5260020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.