Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28118729›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral addictions2017

The role of affect-driven impulsivity in gambling cognitions: A convenience-sample study with a Spanish version of the Gambling-Related Cognitions Scale.

Francesco Del Prete, Trevor Steward, Juan F Navas, Fernando Fernández-Aranda, Susana Jiménez-Murcia, Tian P S Oei, José C Perales

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Systematic Review on Intervention Treatment in Pathological Gambling.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Francesco Del Prete1 Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center, University of Granada , Granada, Spain.
Trevor Steward4 Department of Psychiatry, Bellvitge University Hospital-IDIBELL , Barcelona, Spain.
Juan F Navas1 Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center, University of Granada , Granada, Spain.
Fernando Fernández-Aranda4 Department of Psychiatry, Bellvitge University Hospital-IDIBELL , Barcelona, Spain.
Susana Jiménez-Murcia4 Department of Psychiatry, Bellvitge University Hospital-IDIBELL , Barcelona, Spain.
Tian P S Oei7 School of Psychology, University of Queensland , Brisbane, Australia.
José C Perales1 Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center, University of Granada , Granada, Spain.
Universidad de Granada · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ESBellvitge University Hospital · ESUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims Abnormal cognitions are among the most salient domain-specific features of gambling disorder. The aims of this study were: (a) to examine and validate a Spanish version of the Gambling-Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS; Raylu & Oei, 2004) and (b) to examine associations between cognitive distortion levels, impulsivity, and gambling behavior. Methods This study first recruited a convenience sample of 500 adults who had gambled during the previous year. Participants were assessed using the Spanish version of GRCS (GRCS-S) questionnaire, the UPPS-P impulsivity questionnaire, measures of gambling behavior, and potentially relevant confounders. Robust confirmatory factor analysis methods on half the sample were used to select the best models from a hypothesis-driven set. The best solutions were validated on the other half, and the resulting factors were later correlated with impulsivity dimensions (in the whole n = 500 factor analysis sample) and clinically relevant gambling indices (in a separate convenience sample of 137 disordered and non-disordered gamblers; validity sample). Results This study supports the original five-factor model, suggests an alternative four-factor solution, and confirms the psychometric soundness of the GRCS-S. Importantly, cognitive distortions consistently correlated with affect- or motivation-driven aspects of impulsivity (urgency and sensation seeking), but not with cognitive impulsivity (lack of premeditation and lack of perseverance). Discussion and conclusions Our findings suggest that the GRCS-S is a valid and reliable instrument to identify gambling cognitions in Spanish samples. Our results expand upon previous research signaling specific associations between gambling-related distortions and affect-driven impulsivity in line with models of motivated reasoning.

Indexed as

AffectCognitionImpulsive BehaviorFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleGamblingHumansMalePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultcognitive biasesgambling cognitionsgambling disorderimpulsivitypsychometric tools

Identifiers

PMID28118729
PMCPMC5572993
OpenAlexW2580409837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.