Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28118454›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2017

Continuous Glucose Monitoring vs Conventional Therapy for Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Treated With Multiple Daily Insulin Injections: The GOLD Randomized Clinical Trial.

Marcus Lind, William Polonsky, Irl B Hirsch, Tim Heise, Jan Bolinder, Sofia Dahlqvist, Erik Schwarz, Arndís Finna Ólafsdóttir, Anders Frid, Hans Wedel and 3 more

Erratum issued 5 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 350 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
350citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
45.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02092051 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Trial of the Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) in Individuals With Type 1 Diabetes Treated With Multiple Daily Insulin Injections (MDI)

TypeinterventionalSponsorVastra Gotaland RegionRan2014 to 2016Enrolled161ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1ArmsContinuous glucose monitoring with DexCom G4 platina
NCT03885362 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of the Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Sensors in People With Diabetes Undergoing Haemodialysis

TypeinterventionalSponsorImperial College LondonRan2019 to 2022Enrolled40ConditionsDiabetic Nephropathies, Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Kidney DiseasesArmsDexcom G6 and Abbott Freestyle Libre
NCT05944718 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Three-arm Pragmatic Randomized Study on the Effectiveness, Feasibility, Acceptability, and Cost of the Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices Among People Living With Type 1 Diabetes in South Africa

TypeinterventionalSponsorFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, SwitzerlandRan2023 to 2025Enrolled246ConditionsType 1 DiabetesArmsContinuous glucose monitor
NCT05944731 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices Among People Living With Type 1 Diabetes in Kenya: A Three-arm Pragmatic Randomized Study on the Effectiveness, Feasibility, Acceptability, and Cost.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, SwitzerlandRan2024 to 2025Enrolled246ConditionsType 1 DiabetesArmsContinuous glucose monitor
NCT07769138 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Implementation of Networked Continuous Glucose Monitoring With Telemetry Within the Intensive Care Unit (ICU-TeleCGM)

TypeobservationalSponsorImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustRan2026 to 2028Enrolled70ConditionsType 1 Diabetes, Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Insulin, Hyperglycemia, Intensive Care (ICU)ArmsDexcom G7, ViewsEMR telemetry
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

350 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 679 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2022
    Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Use of Freestyle Libre 2.0 in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus and elevated HbADiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2025
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

290 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Marcus LindDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden2Department of Medicine, NU Hospital Group, Uddevalla, Sweden.
William PolonskyUniversity of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Irl B HirschUniversity of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle.
Tim HeiseProfil, Neuss, Germany.
Jan BolinderDepartment of Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sofia DahlqvistDepartment of Medicine, NU Hospital Group, Uddevalla, Sweden.
Erik SchwarzDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Arndís Finna ÓlafsdóttirDepartment of Medicine, NU Hospital Group, Uddevalla, Sweden.
Anders FridDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö9Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Hans WedelHealth Metrics Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Elsa AhlénDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden2Department of Medicine, NU Hospital Group, Uddevalla, Sweden.
Thomas NyströmDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jarl HellmanDepartment of Medical Sciences, Clinical Diabetes and Metabolism, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
NU Hospital Group · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SEÖrebro University · SEProfil Institute for Metabolic Research · DESkåne University Hospital · SEStockholm South General Hospital · SEUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Washington · USUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The majority of individuals with type 1 diabetes do not meet recommended glycemic targets. Objective: To evaluate the effects of continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes treated with multiple daily insulin injections. Design, Setting, and Participants: Open-label crossover randomized clinical trial conducted in 15 diabetes outpatient clinics in Sweden between February 24, 2014, and June 1, 2016 that included 161 individuals with type 1 diabetes and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of at least 7.5% (58 mmol/mol) treated with multiple daily insulin injections. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive treatment using a continuous glucose monitoring system or conventional treatment for 26 weeks, separated by a washout period of 17 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: Difference in HbA1c between weeks 26 and 69 for the 2 treatments. Adverse events including severe hypoglycemia were also studied. Results: Among 161 randomized participants, mean age was 43.7 years, 45.3% were women, and mean HbA1c was 8.6% (70 mmol/mol). A total of 142 participants had follow-up data in both treatment periods. Mean HbA1c was 7.92% (63 mmol/mol) during continuous glucose monitoring use and 8.35% (68 mmol/mol) during conventional treatment (mean difference, -0.43% [95% CI, -0.57% to -0.29%] or -4.7 [-6.3 to -3.1 mmol/mol]; P < .001). Of 19 secondary end points comprising psychosocial and various glycemic measures, 6 met the hierarchical testing criteria of statistical significance, favoring continuous glucose monitoring compared with conventional treatment. Five patients in the conventional treatment group and 1 patient in the continuous glucose monitoring group had severe hypoglycemia. During washout when patients used conventional therapy, 7 patients had severe hypoglycemia. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with inadequately controlled type 1 diabetes treated with multiple daily insulin injections, the use of continuous glucose monitoring compared with conventional treatment for 26 weeks resulted in lower HbA1c. Further research is needed to assess clinical outcomes and longer-term adverse effects. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02092051.

Indexed as

AdultBlood GlucoseCross-Over StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Drug Administration ScheduleFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionSwedenBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin

Identifiers

PMID28118454
OpenAlexW2582695911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.