Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28118390›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Anesthesia-Induced Hypothermia Attenuates Early-Phase Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption but Not Infarct Volume following Cerebral Ischemia.

Yu-Cheng Liu, Yu-Da Lee, Hwai-Lee Wang, Kate Hsiurong Liao, Kuen-Bao Chen, Kin-Shing Poon, Yu-Ling Pan, Ted Weita Lai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Neuroprotection by Therapeutic Hypothermia.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yu-Cheng LiuGraduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Yu-Da LeeGraduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Hwai-Lee WangGraduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Kate Hsiurong LiaoGraduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Kuen-Bao ChenGraduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Kin-Shing PoonGraduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Yu-Ling PanGraduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Ted Weita LaiGraduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6229-4134
China Medical University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption is thought to facilitate the development of cerebral infarction after a stroke. In a typical stroke model (such as the one used in this study), the early phase of BBB disruption reaches a peak 6 h post-ischemia and largely recovers after 8-24 h, whereas the late phase of BBB disruption begins 48-58 h post-ischemia. Because cerebral infarct develops within 24 h after the onset of ischemia, and several therapeutic agents have been shown to reduce the infarct volume when administered at 6 h post-ischemia, we hypothesized that attenuating BBB disruption at its peak (6 h post-ischemia) can also decrease the infarct volume measured at 24 h. We used a mouse stroke model obtained by combining 120 min of distal middle cerebral arterial occlusion (dMCAo) with ipsilateral common carotid arterial occlusion (CCAo). This model produced the most reliable BBB disruption and cerebral infarction compared to other models characterized by a shorter duration of ischemia or obtained with dMCAO or CCAo alone. The BBB permeability was measured by quantifying Evans blue dye (EBD) extravasation, as this tracer has been shown to be more sensitive for the detection of early-phase BBB disruption compared to other intravascular tracers that are more appropriate for detecting late-phase BBB disruption. We showed that a 1 h-long treatment with isoflurane-anesthesia induced marked hypothermia and attenuated the peak of BBB disruption when administered 6 h after the onset of dMCAo/CCAo-induced ischemia. We also demonstrated that the inhibitory effect of isoflurane was hypothermia-dependent because the same treatment had no effect on ischemic BBB disruption when the mouse body temperature was maintained at 37°C. Importantly, inhibiting the peak of BBB disruption by hypothermia had no effect on the volume of brain infarct 24 h post-ischemia. In conclusion, inhibiting the peak of BBB disruption is not an effective neuroprotective strategy, especially in comparison to the inhibitors of the neuronal death signaling cascade; these, in fact, can attenuate the infarct volume measured at 24 h post-ischemia when administered at 6 h in our same stroke model.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, InhalationBlood-Brain BarrierHypothermia, InducedAnesthetics, InhalationAnimalsArterial Occlusive DiseasesBody TemperatureBrain IschemiaCarotid Artery, CommonCerebral InfarctionDisease Models, AnimalInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryIsofluraneMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLAnesthetics, InhalationIsoflurane

Identifiers

PMID28118390
PMCPMC5261567
OpenAlexW2580265893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.