Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28118092›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2017

Public health impact and economic benefits of quadrivalent influenza vaccine in Latin America.

Aurélien Jamotte, Emilie Clay, Bérengère Macabeo, Andrès Caicedo, Juan Guillermo Lopez, Lucia Bricks, Martín Romero Prada, Rubén Marrugo, Pamela Alfonso, Brechla Moreno Arévalo and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparisons in the Health and Economic Assessments of Using Quadrivalent Versus Trivalent Influenza Vaccines: A Systematic Literature Review.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Aurélien Jamottea Creativ-Ceutical , Paris , France.
Emilie Claya Creativ-Ceutical , Paris , France.
Bérengère Macabeob Sanofi Pasteur , Lyon , France.
Andrès Caicedoc Sanofi Pasteur , Bogota , Colombia.
Juan Guillermo Lopezd Sanofi Pasteur , Mexico , Mexico.
Lucia Brickse Sanofi Pasteur Latin America , Sao Paulo , Brazil.
Martín Romero Pradaf Salutia Foundation , Bogota , Colombia.
Rubén Marrugof Salutia Foundation , Bogota , Colombia.
Pamela Alfonsof Salutia Foundation , Bogota , Colombia.
Brechla Moreno Arévalog The Gorgas Memorial Institute for Health Studies , Panama City , Panama.
Danilo Francog The Gorgas Memorial Institute for Health Studies , Panama City , Panama.
Lourdes Garcia Diazh Ministry of Health , Panama City , Panama.
Yadira Isaza de Moltoh Ministry of Health , Panama City , Panama.
Creativ-Ceutical (France) · FRInstituto Conmemorativo Gorgas de Estudios de la Salud · PAAsociación Colombiana de Facultades de Ingeniería · COSanofi (Brazil) · BRSanofi (France) · FRSanofi (Mexico) · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Annual trivalent influenza vaccines (TIV) containing 2 A strains and one B lineage have been recommended for the prevention of influenza in most of Latin American countries. However, the circulation of 2 B lineages (Victoria and Yamagata) and difficulties in predicting the predominating lineage have led to the development of quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIV), including both B lineages. Thus, the objective was to estimate the public health impact and influenza-related costs if QIV would have been used instead of TIV in 3 Latin American countries. We used a static model over the seasons 2010-2014 in Brazil, 2007-2014 in Colombia and 2006-2014 in Panama, focusing on population groups targeted by local vaccination recommendations: young children, adults with risk factors and the elderly. In Brazil, between 2010 and 2014, using QIV instead of TIV would have avoided US$ 6,200 per 100,000 person-years in societal costs, based on 168 influenza cases, 89 consultations, 3.2 hospitalizations and 0.38 deaths per 100,000 person-years. In Colombia and Panama, these would have ranged from US$ 1,000 to 12,700 (based on 34 cases, 13-25 consultations, 0.6-8.9 hospitalizations and 0.04-1.74 deaths) and from US$ 3,000 to 33,700 (based on 113 cases, 55-82 consultations, 0.5-27.8 hospitalizations and 0.08-6.87 deaths) per 100,000 person-years, respectively. Overall, the broader protection offered by QIV would have reduced the influenza humanistic and economic burden in the 3 countries. Despite the lack of local data leading to several extrapolations, this study is the first to give quantitative estimates of the potential benefits of QIV in Latin America.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrazilChildChild, PreschoolColombiaHumansInfantInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMiddle AgedPanamaYoung AdultInfluenza VaccinesbenefitBrazilColombiacostinfluenzaLatin AmericaPanamapublic healthquadrivalentvaccine

Identifiers

PMID28118092
PMCPMC5404619
OpenAlexW2582474750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.