Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28117882›Full record

ArticleCancer2017

Treatment-associated toxicities reported by patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer.

Christopher R Friese, Jordan M Harrison, Nancy K Janz, Reshma Jagsi, Monica Morrow, Yun Li, Ann S Hamilton, Kevin C Ward, Allison W Kurian, Steven J Katz and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Christopher R FrieseDepartment of Systems, Populations, and Leadership, School of Nursing, and Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan.
Jordan M HarrisonDepartment of Systems, Populations, and Leadership, School of Nursing, and Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan.
Nancy K JanzDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan.
Reshma JagsiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan School of Medicine.
Monica MorrowMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.
Yun LiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health.
Ann S HamiltonUniversity of Southern California Keck School of Medicine.
Kevin C WardRollins School of Public Health, Emory University.
Allison W KurianDepartments of Medicine and Health Research and Policy, Stanford University Medical Center.
Steven J Katz *Departments of Internal Medicine and Health Management and Policy, Schools of Medicine and Public Health, University of Michigan.
Timothy P Hofer *Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Services Research and Development Service Center of Innovation and Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI THEODORE S LAWRENCE · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
CALIFORNIA COORDINATED CANCER PREVENTION & CONTROL PROGRAMU58DP003862 · DP · CALIFORNIA STATE DEPT OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI SNIPES, KURT P · 2012 to 2014
$31.5M
GEORGIA COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CONTROL PROGRAMU58DP003875 · DP · GEORGIA DIVISION OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI O'CONNOR, JEAN CATHERINE · 2012 to 2014
$15.9M
The Challenge of Individualizing Treatments for Patients with Breast CancerP01CA163233 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HOFER, TIMOTHY P. · 2012 to 2016
$13.4M
The National Person-Centered Assessment Resource (PCAR)U2CCA186878 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI CELLA, DAVID · 2014 to 2018
$11.9M
Research BaseP30DK092926 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MARY ELLEN MICHELE HEISLER, ADESUWA B OLOMU · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
CCR NIH HHS HHSN261201300015CNCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP003862NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP003875NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000025CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000034CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000035CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000035INCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000140CNCI NIH HHS P01 CA163233NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NCI NIH HHS U2C CA186878NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-reported toxicities help to appraise the breast cancer treatment experience. Yet extant data come from clinical trials and health care claims, which may be biased. Using patient surveys, the authors sought to quantify the frequency, severity, and burden of treatment-associated toxicities.

methodsBetween 2013 and 2014, the iCanCare study surveyed a population-based sample of women residing in Los Angeles County and Georgia with early-stage, invasive breast cancer. The authors assessed the frequency and severity of toxicities; correlated toxicity severity with unscheduled health care use (clinic visits, emergency department visits/hospitalizations) and physical health; and examined patient, tumor, and treatment factors associated with reporting increased toxicity severity.

resultsThe overall survey response rate was 71%. From the analyzed cohort of 1945 women, 866 (45%) reported at least 1 toxicity that was severe/very severe, 9% reported unscheduled clinic visits for toxicity management, and 5% visited an emergency department or hospital. Factors associated with reporting higher toxicity severity included receipt of chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR], 2.2; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.0-2.5), receipt of both chemotherapy and radiotherapy (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.7), and Latina ethnicity (OR vs whites: 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5). A nonsignificant increase in at least 1 severe/very severe toxicity report was observed for bilateral mastectomy recipients (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.4).

conclusionsWomen with early-stage invasive breast cancer report substantial treatment-associated toxicities and related burden. Clinicians should collect toxicity data routinely and offer early intervention. Toxicity differences observed by treatment modality may inform decision making. Cancer 2017;123:1925-1934. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCancer PainCarcinomaChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantChemotherapy, AdjuvantConstipationDiarrheaDyspneaEdemaEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitalizationHumansLymph NodesMastectomyAntineoplastic Agentsbreast cancerpatient reporttreatment-associated toxicitiestreatment experience

Identifiers

PMID28117882
PMCPMC5444953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.