Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28117806›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2017

Online Size-exclusion and Ion-exchange Chromatography on a SAXS Beamline.

Martha E Brennich, Adam R Round, Stephanie Hutin

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Upgraded D22 SEC-SANS setup dedicated to the biology community.Journal of applied crystallography · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Journal of applied crystallography · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martha E BrennichStructural Biology Group, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility.
Adam R RoundEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory; School of Chemical and Physical Sciences, Keele University.
Stephanie HutinGroupe de Microscopie Electronique et Méthodes, Institut de Biologie Structurale; stephanie.hutin@ibs.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological small angle X-ray scattering (BioSAXS) is a powerful technique in molecular and structural biology used to determine solution structure, particle size and shape, and surface-to-volume ratio of macromolecules. The technique is applicable to a very wide variety of solution conditions spanning a broad range of concentrations, pH values, ionic strengths, temperatures, additives, etc., but the sample is required to be monodisperse. This caveat led to the implementation of liquid chromatography systems on SAXS beamlines. Here, we describe the upstream integration of size-exclusion (SEC) and ion-exchange chromatography (IEC) on a beamline, different methods for optimal background subtraction, and data reduction. As an example, we describe how we use SEC- and IEC-SAXS on a fragment of the essential vaccinia virus protein D5, consisting of a D5N helicase domain. We determine its overall shape and molecular weight, showing the hexameric structure of the protein.

Indexed as

Scattering, Small AngleX-Ray DiffractionChromatography, High Pressure LiquidChromatography, Ion ExchangeDNA HelicasesMolecular WeightProtein Structure, QuaternaryRecombinant ProteinsVaccinia virusViral ProteinsDNA HelicasesRecombinant ProteinsViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28117806
PMCPMC5409194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.