Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28117475›Full record

ArticleJornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia

Educational interventions to improve inhaler techniques and their impact on asthma and COPD control: a pilot effectiveness-implementation trial.

Tiago Maricoto, Sofia Madanelo, Luís Rodrigues, Gilberto Teixeira, Carla Valente, Lília Andrade, Alcina Saraiva

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tiago MaricotoUnidade de Cuidados de Saúde Personalizados - UCSP - Aveiro I, Centro de Saúde de Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Sofia MadaneloUnidade de Saúde Familiar de Santa Joana, Centro de Saúde de Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Luís RodriguesDepartamento de Pneumologia, Centro Hospitalar do Baixo Vouga, Aveiro, Portugal.
Gilberto TeixeiraDepartamento de Pneumologia, Centro Hospitalar do Baixo Vouga, Aveiro, Portugal.
Carla ValenteDepartamento de Pneumologia, Centro Hospitalar do Baixo Vouga, Aveiro, Portugal.
Lília AndradeDepartamento de Pneumologia, Centro Hospitalar do Baixo Vouga, Aveiro, Portugal.
Alcina SaraivaDepartamento de Pneumologia, Centro Hospitalar do Baixo Vouga, Aveiro, Portugal.
Centro Hospitalar do Baixo Vouga · PTAdministração Regional de Saúde de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess the impact that educational interventions to improve inhaler techniques have on the clinical and functional control of asthma and COPD, we evaluated 44 participants before and after such an intervention. There was a significant decrease in the number of errors, and 20 patients (46%) significantly improved their technique regarding prior exhalation and breath hold. In the asthma group, there were significant improvements in the mean FEV1, FVC, and PEF (of 6.4%, 8.6%, and 8.3% respectively). Those improvements were accompanied by improvements in Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test scores but not in Asthma Control Test scores. In the COPD group, there were no significant variations. In asthma patients, educational interventions appear to improve inhaler technique, clinical control, and functional control. RESUMO Para avaliar o impacto do ensino da técnica inalatória no controle clínico e funcional de pacientes com asma ou DPOC, incluíram-se 44 participantes antes e após essa intervenção. Houve uma diminuição significativa no número de erros cometidos, sendo que 20 pacientes (46%) melhoraram significativamente sua técnica na expiração prévia e apneia final. No grupo asma, houve significativa melhora nas médias de FEV1 (6,4%), CVF (8,6%) e PFE (8,3%), e essa melhora correlacionou-se com os resultados no Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test, mas não com os do Asthma Control Test. No grupo DPOC, não houve variações significativas. O ensino da técnica inalatória parece melhorar seu desempenho e os controles clínico e funcional em pacientes com asma.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAsthmaControlled Before-After StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNebulizers and VaporizersPatient Education as TopicPortugalPulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Identifiers

PMID28117475
PMCPMC5344093
OpenAlexW2570766345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.