Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28117340›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

Superior colliculus neurons encode a visual saliency map during free viewing of natural dynamic video.

Brian J White, David J Berg, Janis Y Kan, Robert A Marino, Laurent Itti, Douglas P Munoz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Saliency Response in Superior Colliculus at the Future Saccade Goal Predicts Fixation Duration during Free Viewing of Dynamic Scenes.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brian J WhiteCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, 18 Stuart St, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L3N6.
David J BergIBM Research, Almaden, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, California 95120, USA.
Janis Y KanCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, 18 Stuart St, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L3N6.
Robert A MarinoCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, 18 Stuart St, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L3N6.
Laurent IttiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Southern California, 0781, 941 Bloom Walk, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA.
Douglas P MunozCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, 18 Stuart St, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L3N6.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Models of visual attention postulate the existence of a saliency map whose function is to guide attention and gaze to the most conspicuous regions in a visual scene. Although cortical representations of saliency have been reported, there is mounting evidence for a subcortical saliency mechanism, which pre-dates the evolution of neocortex. Here, we conduct a strong test of the saliency hypothesis by comparing the output of a well-established computational saliency model with the activation of neurons in the primate superior colliculus (SC), a midbrain structure associated with attention and gaze, while monkeys watched video of natural scenes. We find that the activity of SC superficial visual-layer neurons (SCs), specifically, is well-predicted by the model. This saliency representation is unlikely to be inherited from fronto-parietal cortices, which do not project to SCs, but may be computed in SCs and relayed to other areas via tectothalamic pathways.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsAttentionComputer SimulationMacaca mulattaMaleModels, AnimalNeural PathwaysNeuronsPhotic StimulationSaccadesSoftwareSuperior ColliculiThalamusVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID28117340
PMCPMC5286207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.