Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28116795›Full record

Observational studyDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2017

Novel oral glucose-lowering drugs are associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events and severe hypoglycaemia compared with insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Thomas Nyström, Johan Bodegard, David Nathanson, Marcus Thuresson, Anna Norhammar, Jan W Eriksson

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. SGLT1: A Potential Drug Target for Cardiovascular Disease.Drug design, development and therapy · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas NyströmUnit for Diabetes Research, Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institute, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan BodegardAstraZeneca Nordic-Baltic, Södertälje, Sweden.
David NathansonUnit for Diabetes Research, Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institute, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marcus ThuressonCardiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna NorhammarStatisticon AB, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jan W ErikssonDepartment of Medical Sciences, Clinical Diabetes and Metabolism, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2639-9481
Karolinska Institutet · SEAstraZeneca (Sweden) · SEStatisticon (Sweden) · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo investigate the association of novel oral glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs), compared with that of insulin, with risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and severe hypoglycaemia.

methodsDuring 2013 to 2014 all patients with type 2 diabetes in Sweden identified as new users of novel oral GLDs, either dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (only dapagliflozin available in Sweden during the study period), with those initiating insulin as a comparison group, in the Prescribed Drug Register were included and followed in the Patient and Cause of Death Registers. The novel GLD group and insulin group were matched 1:1 using propensity score. Cox regression models were used to estimate risks.

resultsOf 37 603 patients, 21 758 were matched 1:1 to novel GLD vs insulin groups, with median follow-up times of 1.51 years (16 304 patient-years) and 1.53 years (16 306 patient-years), respectively. Treatment with novel GLDs was associated with a 44% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.56 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.49-0.64]), 15% (HR 0.85 [95% CI 0.73-0.99]) and 74% (0.26 [95% CI 0.12-0.57]) lower risk of all-cause mortality, CVD and hypoglycaemia, respectively, compared with insulin treatment. In separate analyses for the two novel GLDs, dapagliflozin was associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality and CVD (56% [HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.70] and 49% [HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.30-0.86], respectively), while DPP-4 inhibitor treatment was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality (41% [HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.51-0.67]), but not with CVD (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.75-1.01).

conclusionsNovel oral GLD treatment was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality, CVD and severe hypoglycaemia compared with insulin treatment. Dapagliflozin was associated with a lower risk of both all-cause mortality and CVD, whereas DPP-4 inhibitor treatment was only associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAgedBenzhydryl CompoundsCardiovascular DiseasesCause of DeathDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsFemaleGlucosidesHumansHypoglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreProportional Hazards ModelsBenzhydryl CompoundsdapagliflozinDipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsGlucosidesHypoglycemic Agentscardiovascular diseasedapagliflozinDPP-4 inhibitorhypoglycaemiapharmaco-epidemiologytype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID28116795
PMCPMC5485030
OpenAlexW2585095576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.