Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28116650›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2017

The safety of resection for primary central nervous system lymphoma: a single institution retrospective analysis.

Michael Brendan Cloney, Adam M Sonabend, Jonathan Yun, Jingyan Yang, Fabio Iwamoto, Suprit Singh, Govind Bhagat, Peter Canoll, George Zanazzi, Jeffrey N Bruce and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The role of surgery in intracranial PCNSL.Neurosurgical review · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael Brendan CloneyDepartment of Neurological Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, 710 W 168th Street, Room 426, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Adam M SonabendDepartment of Neurological Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, 710 W 168th Street, Room 426, New York, NY, 10032, USA. as3537@cumc.columbia.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5791-7547
Jonathan YunDepartment of Neurological Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, 710 W 168th Street, Room 426, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Jingyan YangDepartment of Epidemiology, The Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Fabio IwamotoDepartment of Neurology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Suprit SinghDepartment of Neurological Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, 710 W 168th Street, Room 426, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Govind BhagatDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Peter CanollDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
George ZanazziDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jeffrey N BruceDepartment of Neurological Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, 710 W 168th Street, Room 426, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Michael SistiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, 710 W 168th Street, Room 426, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Sameer ShethDepartment of Neurological Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, 710 W 168th Street, Room 426, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
E Sander ConnollyDepartment of Neurological Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, 710 W 168th Street, Room 426, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Guy McKhannDepartment of Neurological Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, 710 W 168th Street, Room 426, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USColumbia University · US

Funding

TOP2A effects on transcription in gliomas: implications for personalized therapyDP5OD021356 · OD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI SONABEND, ADAM M · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
NIH HHS DP5 OD021356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical resection is not the standard of care for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), as historical studies have demonstrated unfavorable complication rates and limited benefits. Some recent studies suggest that resection may provide a therapeutic benefit, yet the safety of these procedures has not been systematically investigated in the setting of modern neurosurgery. We examined the safety of surgical resection for PCNSL. We retrospectively analyzed all patients with PCNSL treated at Columbia University Medical Center between 2000 and 2015 to assess complications rates following biopsy or resection using the Glioma Outcomes Project system. We identified predictors of complications and selection for resection. Well-validated scales were used to quantify patients' baseline clinical characteristics, including functional status, comorbid disease burden, and cardiac risk. The overall complication rate was 17.2% after resection, and 28.2% after biopsy. Cardiac risk (p = 0.047, OR 1.72 [1.01, 2.95]), and comorbid diagnoses (p = 0.004, OR 3.05 [1.42, 6.57]) predicted complications on multivariable regression. Patients who underwent resection had better KPS scores (median 70 v. 80, p = 0.0068, ∆ 10 [0.0, 10.00]), and were less likely to have multiple (46.5% v. 27.6%, p = 0.030, OR 1.42 [1.05, 1.92]) or deep lesions (70.4% v. 39.7%, p = 0.001, OR 1.83 [1.26, 2.65]). Age (p = 0.048, OR 0.75 per 10-year increase [0.56, 1.00]) and deep lesions (p = 0.003, OR 0.29 [0.13, 0.65]) influenced selection for resection on multivariable regression. Surgical resection of PCNSL is safe for select patients, with complication rates comparable to rates for other intracranial neoplasms. Whether there is a clinical benefit to resection cannot be concluded.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyBrain NeoplasmsCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsHumansLymphomaMiddle AgedNeurosurgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultCentral nervous system lymphomaCNS lymphomaComplicationsPCNSLResection

Identifiers

PMID28116650
PMCPMC5367383
OpenAlexW2582316012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.