Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28116638›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater2017

[Psychiatry and psychiatric patients : A study of the adherence after psychiatric inpatient treatment at the department of psychiatry and psychotherapy at the Clinicum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee.]

Herwig Oberlerchner, Kerstin Findenig, Otto Liechtenecker, Bernadette Mörtl-Kessler, Margot Reiter, Ursula Riess, Sabrina Suppan, Iris Walcher, Birgit Senft

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Herwig OberlerchnerAbteilung für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Feschnigstr. 11, 9020, Klagenfurt, Österreich. herwig.oberlerchner@kabeg.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0700-527X
Kerstin FindenigAbteilung für Gesundheitsökonomie und ärztlichen Dienst, Kärntner Gebietskrankenkasse, Klagenfurt, Österreich.
Otto LiechteneckerAbteilung für Gesundheitsökonomie und ärztlichen Dienst, Kärntner Gebietskrankenkasse, Klagenfurt, Österreich.
Bernadette Mörtl-KesslerAbteilung für Gesundheitsökonomie und ärztlichen Dienst, Kärntner Gebietskrankenkasse, Klagenfurt, Österreich.
Margot ReiterAbteilung für Gesundheitsökonomie und ärztlichen Dienst, Kärntner Gebietskrankenkasse, Klagenfurt, Österreich.
Ursula RiessAbteilung für Gesundheitsökonomie und ärztlichen Dienst, Kärntner Gebietskrankenkasse, Klagenfurt, Österreich.
Sabrina SuppanAbteilung für Gesundheitsökonomie und ärztlichen Dienst, Kärntner Gebietskrankenkasse, Klagenfurt, Österreich.
Iris WalcherAbteilung für Gesundheitsökonomie und ärztlichen Dienst, Kärntner Gebietskrankenkasse, Klagenfurt, Österreich.
Birgit Senftstatistix, Klagenfurt, Österreich.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBased on the data of an analysis of costs of psychopharmacological treatment by the Austrian Rechnungshof in 2011, which also revealed remarkable differences between Salzburg and Carinthia (federal states of Austria), a panel of experts discussed the potential causes. A consequence was the following prospective study, which took place at the department of psychiatry and psychotherapy in Klagenfurt/Carinthia.

methodsThe aim in this mirror design study was to analize the data of psychopharmacologic treatment, epidemiological data of the treated patients (N = 230) and utilization of healthcare ressources such as contacts to psychiatrists or practicioners after discharge.

resultsWe could show a high adherence concerning the redeem of the prescriptions, a low proportion of generics, and a very low rate of contacts to psychiatrists contrasting contacts to practitioners.

conclusionsBeneath that in the sense of descriptive epidemiology the data help to characterize adherence behavior after discharge and details of in- and outdoor treatment.

Indexed as

Patient DischargePsychiatric Department, HospitalPsychotherapyAdultAustriaCosts and Cost AnalysisFemaleHumansLong-Term CareMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedNational Health ProgramsPatient ComplianceProspective StudiesPsychotropic DrugsPsychotropic DrugsAdherenceDischarge ManagementFrequent userPsychiatric inpatient treatmentPsychopharmacologyUtilization of Healthcare Ressources

Identifiers

PMID28116638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.